Service Acceptance Criteria

I have often been asked what value does the Service Acceptance Criteria (SAC) provide?

First let’s understand what the SAC is by definition.

Service Acceptance Criteria: A set of criteria used to ensure that an IT Service meets its functionality and quality requirements and that the IT Service Provider is ready to operate the new IT Service when it has been deployed. This set of criteria is in the form of a formal agreement that an IT Service, Process, Plan or other deliverable is complete, accurate, reliable and meets the specified requirements.

We must understand that all design activities are triggered by changes in business needs or service improvements. In order to design and deliver IT services that meet the changing needs of the customers and the business, we must ensure that the contents of the Service Acceptance Criteria are incorporated and the required achievements are planned into the initial design.

The Service Acceptance Criteria is the document that will ensure the Service Provider is ready to deliver the new service by answering the following criteria:

Has the go live date been agreed to with all parties?
Has the deployment project and schedule been agreed to and made public to all stakeholders?
Have all SLR/SLA’s been reviewed, revised and agreed to with all stakeholders?
Has the Service Catalogue/Portfolio been updated and all appropriate relationships established within the Configuration Management System?
Have all users been identified/approved and appropriate accounts created for them?
Can all SLR/SLA targets be monitored, measured, reported and reviewed?
Can performance and capacity targets be measured and incorporated into the Capacity Plan?
Have incident and problem categories and processes been reviewed and revised for the new service?
Has appropriate technical support documentation been provided and accepted by Incident, Problem and all IT support teams?
Have all users been trained and user documentation been supplied and accepted?
Have appropriate business managers signed off acceptance of the new service?

With this documented criteria in hand we can insure that the Service Provider will meet the agreed needs of the customer and the business. It will insure that availability, capacity, security and continuity can be assured and thereby deliver value to the business.

Comments

Manuel said…

Who its responsible?

November 14, 2012 at 1:38 PM

Professor P. Ross S. Wise said…

The Service Design Manager or process owner for Design Coordination would be responsible.

March 28, 2013 at 8:21 PM

Four Service Characteristics

Recently I came across several articles by researchers and experts that laid out definitions and characteristics of services. ITIL provides us with a definition that can help drive the creation of value-laden services: A means of delivering value to customers by facilitating outcomes customers want to achieve without the ownership of specific costs and risks. An area that ITIL is not so clear is in terms of service characteristics. Several researchers and experts put forth that services have four basic characteristics (IHIP): Intangibility—Services are the results of actions not things. They have no physical presence and represent a logical set of elements. One way to think of service is “work done for others.” Heterogeneity—Also known as “variability”; services are unique items because of the mechanisms used to deliver services, which is people. Because the people element adds variability, the service is variable. This holds true, especially for the value proposition—not eve...

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL 4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group. As a service provider, we can’t stop there! We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer. Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include: Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions 1. Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods. Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service then toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you. You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you. ...

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

This article was originally published in 2015. With the Introduction of ITIL 4, some of this best practice has changed. See ITIL 4 and the Evolving Role of Roles . Updated Definitions in ITIL 4: Process Owner: In ITIL 4, the concept of 'processes' has expanded into broader 'practices.' Consequently, the Process Owner is now often referred to as the 'Practice Owner.' This individual is accountable for the overall design, performance, integration, and improvement of a specific practice within the organization. They ensure that the practice achieves its intended outcomes and aligns with the organization's objectives. Process Manager: Now commonly known as the 'Practice Manager' in ITIL 4, this role is responsible for the day-to-day management of the practice. The Practice Manager ensures that activities are carried out as intended, manages resources assigned to the practice, and oversees the practitioners performing the work. Process Practit...

Search