Skip to main content

Collaboration

As I sit and listen to some classical music, the idea of collaboration comes to mind. To make the music,  the symphony needs to work together, yet play as individual musicians. I cannot play your part, nor can you play mine. By playing each of our parts together as part of the bigger whole, we can create something bigger than either of us. We call this the “primacy of the whole”-the sum is greater than the individual parts. This is the basis of collaboration.

Pulling together a group of people into a team and instructing them to use “teamwork” or to “work as a team” does not equate to collaboration. A recent presentation made sense of this. Wikipedia© would not have come together as we know it if all the contributors had been put in the same space and given the instruction to create the site. The online encyclopedia exists precisely because the contributors did not know each other and did not work together in forced cooperation. The contributors created the information because they collaborated on a greater vision—each adding a piece to the whole with the greater end in mind. This does not mean that everyone agreed or was in total alignment on how to achieve the vision. Rather the contributors had the opportunity to discuss, debate, decide and then support the outcome.
So how do we get true collaboration? Here are some thought starters to point you down the right path towards more effective collaboration:
·        Create a problem or issue statement. Use this to help guide where you ultimately want to go.

·        Set a vision or picture of the result, but do not flesh out details. Let the collaborators add the detail and refine the vision as they go along.

·        Be open to whatever outcomes the collaborators determine. Do not have a set solution in your mind. Avoid having solutions in search of problems.

·        Give people time to both innovate (create or produce) and incubate (think about creating or producing). Leonardo Da Vinci used this cyclical approach to great success.

·        Utilize modern technology to facilitate collaboration (instant messaging, video conferencing, collaboration sites and tools). Embrace virtualization as a means to end, not as the end itself.

·        Select various personalities, rather than various skillsets or capabilities to work in collaboration. This will allow the team to determine which skills are needed rather being limited to the available skills. IT will also foster healthy debate and discussion of possible outcomes.

·        Eliminate interruptions and distractions as much as possible. Shutdown email, lock your office door, go to a quiet place away from others to get things done. Institute “No Talk Thursdays” where silence, rather than conversation, is the rule.
These few items should help you get started on collaboration that is more effective. Let work happen organically. Do not try to force it and the beautiful music will result.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Four Service Characteristics

Recently I came across several articles by researchers and experts that laid out definitions and characteristics of services. ITIL provides us with a definition that can help drive the creation of value-laden services: A means of delivering value to customers by facilitating outcomes customers want to achieve without the ownership of specific costs and risks. An area that ITIL is not so clear is in terms of service characteristics. Several researchers and experts put forth that services have four basic characteristics (IHIP): Intangibility—Services are the results of actions not things. They have no physical presence and represent a logical set of elements. One way to think of service is “work done for others.”  Heterogeneity—Also known as “variability”; services are unique items because of the mechanisms used to deliver services, which is people. Because the people element adds variability, the service is variable. This holds true, especially for the value proposition—not eve...

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL 4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group.   As a service provider, we can’t stop there!   We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer.     Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include:     Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions 1. Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods.   Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service then toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you.   You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you.      ...

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

This article was originally published in 2015. With the Introduction of ITIL 4, some of this best practice has changed. See  ITIL 4 and the Evolving Role of Roles . Updated Definitions in ITIL 4: Process Owner: In ITIL 4, the concept of 'processes' has expanded into broader 'practices.' Consequently, the Process Owner is now often referred to as the 'Practice Owner.' This individual is accountable for the overall design, performance, integration, and improvement of a specific practice within the organization. They ensure that the practice achieves its intended outcomes and aligns with the organization's objectives. Process Manager: Now commonly known as the 'Practice Manager' in ITIL 4, this role is responsible for the day-to-day management of the practice. The Practice Manager ensures that activities are carried out as intended, manages resources assigned to the practice, and oversees the practitioners performing the work. Process Practit...