The Difference between Change and Release Management

There is often confusion between the goals, authorities and roles of Change and Release Management. In fact, the objectives of each of process are very, very different.

Change rules! Change Management is an authoritative process that governs anything that potentially impacts a new or existing service. It is both the enabler of innovation and protector of stability. It is first and foremost a risk management process. It is also a planning process.

If Change Management is a governance process, Release Management is an action process. Under the authority of Change, Release builds, tests and releases new or updated services into the production environment. Every release is comprised of a single change or package of changes. Release Management is more technical than Change.

If done well, both processes will avoid unnecessary levels of bureaucracy and will build a collection of change and release models that pre-define and pre-approve the rigor required based on levels of risk. The more mature the processes, the higher number of standard changes. Approaches such as Agile and DevOps help to limit over processing while improving the flow of all changes from concept to operation.

A learner recently asked about the relationship between projects, the PMO and Change/ Release Management. Remember, that Change and Release Management are only processes – on their own they do nothing – they must be executed by people. Every project will likely spawn multiple changes to infrastructure, applications and/or documentation. Each change will either be unique or fall within the bounds of an existing change model. Releases emanating out of the project can be handled singularly, sequentially or packaged together when it makes sense. Since the PMO will manage the project, I would expect that the PMO would similarly request and manage the changes.

See more blogs about this. And ITSM Academy's ITIL portfolio: www.itsmacademy.com/itil

Comments

Four Service Characteristics

Recently I came across several articles by researchers and experts that laid out definitions and characteristics of services. ITIL provides us with a definition that can help drive the creation of value-laden services: A means of delivering value to customers by facilitating outcomes customers want to achieve without the ownership of specific costs and risks. An area that ITIL is not so clear is in terms of service characteristics. Several researchers and experts put forth that services have four basic characteristics (IHIP): Intangibility—Services are the results of actions not things. They have no physical presence and represent a logical set of elements. One way to think of service is “work done for others.” Heterogeneity—Also known as “variability”; services are unique items because of the mechanisms used to deliver services, which is people. Because the people element adds variability, the service is variable. This holds true, especially for the value proposition—not eve...

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL 4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group. As a service provider, we can’t stop there! We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer. Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include: Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions 1. Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods. Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service then toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you. You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you. ...

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

This article was originally published in 2015. With the Introduction of ITIL 4, some of this best practice has changed. See ITIL 4 and the Evolving Role of Roles . Updated Definitions in ITIL 4: Process Owner: In ITIL 4, the concept of 'processes' has expanded into broader 'practices.' Consequently, the Process Owner is now often referred to as the 'Practice Owner.' This individual is accountable for the overall design, performance, integration, and improvement of a specific practice within the organization. They ensure that the practice achieves its intended outcomes and aligns with the organization's objectives. Process Manager: Now commonly known as the 'Practice Manager' in ITIL 4, this role is responsible for the day-to-day management of the practice. The Practice Manager ensures that activities are carried out as intended, manages resources assigned to the practice, and oversees the practitioners performing the work. Process Practit...

Search