To Collaborate or To Compromise … Which Is Best?

The people factor and your ability to absorb change could and does make all the difference for IT service providers. Most IT practitioners will agree that “change” requires some organizational change management. Organizational Change Management (OCM) is the process of preparing, motivating and equipping people to meet new business challenges. Conflict can be looked upon as good! Embrace conflict don’t ignore or avoid it because it is necessary to listen to conflicting opinions that may not have been considered. Learning to use different conflict modes helps to move forward and increase engagement that could make your organizational change a success.

The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument is a tool for helping people understand how different conflict-handling styles affect interpersonal and group dynamics and for empowering them to choose the appropriate style for any situation. I was studying this in preparation for an “Organizational Change Management” workshop and had an ah-ha moment regarding the use of “Collaborating” vs. “Compromising”.

It always appeared to me that compromising was good. Jayne Groll, President of ITSM Academy, explained that compromising is not bad but perhaps “collaborating” would be better. This makes perfect sense when we think about the fact that when you compromise someone is giving up something. That means that someone “loses” some and that another “wins” more. There is an agreement or “compromise” on this win/loss solution but a “Win” and “Loss” none the less. Now let’s consider “collaboration”. Collaborating is both assertive and cooperative. Collaborating involves an attempt to work with others to find some solution that fully satisfies their concerns. It means digging into an issue to pinpoint the underlying needs and wants of the two individuals. Collaborating between two persons might take the form of exploring a disagreement to learn from each other's insights or trying to find a creative solution to an interpersonal problem. The greatest benefit is that “collaboration” ensures a win/win solution.

So should we “Collaborate” or “Compromise”? The answer is yes. The challenge is to know the difference between these and other conflict-handling styles and when to use them to ensure your strategic initiatives.

To learn more:

http://www.itsmacademy.com/orgchange/

https://www.cpp.com/products/tki/index.aspx

Comments

Four Service Characteristics

Recently I came across several articles by researchers and experts that laid out definitions and characteristics of services. ITIL provides us with a definition that can help drive the creation of value-laden services: A means of delivering value to customers by facilitating outcomes customers want to achieve without the ownership of specific costs and risks. An area that ITIL is not so clear is in terms of service characteristics. Several researchers and experts put forth that services have four basic characteristics (IHIP): Intangibility—Services are the results of actions not things. They have no physical presence and represent a logical set of elements. One way to think of service is “work done for others.” Heterogeneity—Also known as “variability”; services are unique items because of the mechanisms used to deliver services, which is people. Because the people element adds variability, the service is variable. This holds true, especially for the value proposition—not eve...

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL 4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group. As a service provider, we can’t stop there! We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer. Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include: Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions 1. Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods. Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service then toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you. You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you. ...

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

This article was originally published in 2015. With the Introduction of ITIL 4, some of this best practice has changed. See ITIL 4 and the Evolving Role of Roles . Updated Definitions in ITIL 4: Process Owner: In ITIL 4, the concept of 'processes' has expanded into broader 'practices.' Consequently, the Process Owner is now often referred to as the 'Practice Owner.' This individual is accountable for the overall design, performance, integration, and improvement of a specific practice within the organization. They ensure that the practice achieves its intended outcomes and aligns with the organization's objectives. Process Manager: Now commonly known as the 'Practice Manager' in ITIL 4, this role is responsible for the day-to-day management of the practice. The Practice Manager ensures that activities are carried out as intended, manages resources assigned to the practice, and oversees the practitioners performing the work. Process Practit...

Search