Skip to main content

The Purpose and Value of Business Impact Analysis

When discussing Service Design I am often asked the purpose and value of a Business Impact Assessment (BIA).  The purpose of a BIA is to quantify the impact to the business that the loss of a service would have.  It is a valuable source of input when trying to ascertain the business needs, impacts and risks that the organization may face in the delivery of services.  The Business Impact Assessment is an essential element of the overall business continuity process.  It identifies the most important services to the organization and therefore will help to define the overall strategy for risk reduction and disaster recovery.  At a more granular level these assessments enable the mapping of critical service applications and technology components to critical business processes.  It is an invaluable input for Continuity Strategy, Availability Design, and Capacity Management. 
The BIA’s strategic purpose is to show which parts of the business will be most affected by a major incident and what affect it will have on the company as a whole.  The form these damages or losses may come in are:        
  • Loss of income
  • Additional costs
  • Damaged reputation
  • Loss of goodwill
  • Loss of competitive advantage
  • Breach of law, health or safety
  • Immediate and long term loss of market share
  • Political, corporate or personal embarrassment
  • Loss of operational capability
As part of the design phase of a new or changed service the BIA should be conducted to help enable a greater understanding about the function and importance of a service.   This will allow the organization to define:
  • Acceptable levels and times of a service outage.  How the degree of damage is likely to escalate after a service disruption, and the times of day, week, month or year when a disruption will inflict the greatest damage.
  • The staffing, skills, facilities and services necessary to enable critical and essential business processes to continue to operate at minimum acceptable levels.
  • The time within which all required business processes and supporting staff, facilities and services should be fully recovered.
  • The cost the loss of a service has to the business.  This is critical for Financial Management.
Additionally, it has been shown that the BIA can be a useful input to a number of other areas across ITSM and the business and would give a far greater understanding of the service then would otherwise be the case.

Comments

Unknown said…
When to do the BIA? Just at DESIGN stage or at STRATEGY STAGE too? I am reading about BIA at FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT PROCESS. So BIA is a "tool" used in which processes?
Jayne Groll said…
BIAs can be done at various stages of the lifecycle and are activitiess particularly important to processes such as Availability and IT Service Continuity Management. I would suggest performing a BIA during Service Strategy as part of the business case. Not only does this help make decisions on whether to proceed, it also avoids multiple BIAs later in the lifecycle.

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

I was recently asked to clarify the roles of the Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner and wanted to share this with you.

Roles and Responsibilities:
Process Owner – this individual is “Accountable” for the process. They are the goto person and represent this process across the entire organization. They will ensure that the process is clearly defined, designed and documented. They will ensure that the process has a set of Policies for governance.Example: The process owner for Incident management will ensure that all of the activities to Identify, Record, Categorize, Investigate, … all the way to closing the incident are defined and documented with clearly defined roles, responsibilities, handoffs, and deliverables. An example of a policy in could be… “All Incidents must be logged”. Policies are rules that govern the process. Process Owner ensures that all Process activities, (what to do), Procedures (details on how to perform the activity) and the policies (r…

How Does ITIL Help in the Management of the SDLC?

I was recently asked how ITIL helps in the management of the SDLC (Software Development Lifecycle).  Simply put... SDLC is a Lifecycle approach to produce the software or the "product".  ITIL is a Lifecycle approach that focuses on the "service".
I’ll start by reviewing both SDLC and ITIL Lifecycles and then summarize:
SDLC  -  The intent of an SDLC process is to help produce a product that is cost-efficient, effective and of high quality. Once an application is created, the SDLC maps the proper deployment of the software into the live environment. The SDLC methodology usually contains the following stages: Analysis (requirements and design), construction, testing, release and maintenance.  The focus here is on the Software.  Most organizations will use an Agile or Waterfall approach to implement the software through the Software Development Lifecycle.
ITIL  -  is a best practice for IT service management (ITSM) that focuses on aligning IT services with the needs …

Incidents when a Defect is Involved

Question: We currently track defects in a separate system than our ticket management system. With that said, my question is does anyone have suggestions and/or best practices on how to handle incidents when a defect is involved? Should the incident be closed since the defect is being worked on in another defect tracking system if it is noted in the incident ticket? I am considering creating an incident statuses of 'closed-unresolved' so the incident can still be reported on in our ticket management system but know it is being worked on/tracked in the defect system. With defects, it is possible that we may never work on them because they are very low priority and the impact is low to the user. However, in some cases a defect is being worked on. Should we create a problem ticket instead?
Thanks, René W.

Answer: RenĂ©. In ITIL, the activity you are describing is handled by the Problem Management process. ITIL does not use the term “defect” but it does use the term “known error” to…