Skip to main content

CSI and Design Coordination

I have often been asked about how to implement a good design coordination process.  My response is have you ever thought of implementation of a new process from a CSI approach?  First let’s understand what the purpose and objective of a design and coordination process should be.  Ensuring that the goals and objectives are met by providing and maintaining a single point of coordination and control for all activities and processes within the design stage of the lifecycle.  If we approach this from a Continual Service Improvement perspective the first question to ask is:


What’s the vision?  
Come to an accord among key stakeholders about what it is you want to create and what the underpinning critical success factors should be in support of the defined goals and objectives of the organization.  Will they ultimately support the long term mission and vision of the business leadership?
Where are we now?
Set that baseline starting point about the current condition of where your service design activities are.  Remember these must be measured and agreed. Questions need to be asked and assessments need to be made.  What activities are currently performed and by whom?  What are the challenges and weaknesses that are being experienced?  What is working well?  What are the pain points that are being expressed by both the business and your IT organization?  What skills and capabilities are listed in your skills library and which will we need to acquire into the future?
Where do we want to be?
This is where we now agree on priorities for improvement.  These of course, will be based on the overall vision for Service Design and the current state of affairs.  The guiding principle should be that the implementation of the Service Design Coordination process should ensure a reliable, repeatable, consistent delivery of the resources to deliver the practices of Service Design.
How do we get there?
Through the implementation of an agreed and detailed plan on how to move from the “AS IS” state to the “TO BE” state.
Did we get there?
Through the use of defined and agreed metrics, KPIs and CSFs determine if the improvements to the Service Design processes and activities have been successful in meeting the agreed “TO BE” state.  If a gap continues to exist between the new current state and the desired state, then another cycle of improvements will be necessary.   Remember that these improvements can be implemented in a phased approach.
How do we keep the momentum going?
By using are ongoing monitoring and measuring capabilities to ensure the level of performance of our  new Service Design practices become part of our culture and that they can continue to meet the ever changing needs of the organization.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Four Ps of Service Design - It’s not all about Technology

People ask me why I think that many designs and projects often fail. The most common answer is from a lack of preparation and management. Many IT organizations just think about the technology (product) implementation and fail to understand the risks of not planning for the effective and efficient use of the four Ps: People, Process, Products (services, technology and tools) and Partners (suppliers, manufacturers and vendors). A holistic approach should be adopted for all Service Design aspects and areas to ensure consistency and integration within all activities and processes across the entire IT environment, providing end to end business-related functionality and quality. (SD 2.4.2) People:   Have to have proper skills and possess the necessary competencies in order to get involved in the provision of IT services. The right skills, the right knowledge, the right level of experience must be kept current and aligned to the business needs. Products:   These are the technology managem

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group .   As a service provider, we can’t stop there!   We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer.     Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include:     Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods.   Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service then toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you.   You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you.               Note: Goods may not always be provided for every Service Offe

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

I was recently asked to clarify the roles of the Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner and wanted to share this with you. Roles and Responsibilities: Process Owner – this individual is “Accountable” for the process. They are the goto person and represent this process across the entire organization. They will ensure that the process is clearly defined, designed and documented. They will ensure that the process has a set of Policies for governance. Example: The process owner for Incident management will ensure that all of the activities to Identify, Record, Categorize, Investigate, … all the way to closing the incident are defined and documented with clearly defined roles, responsibilities, handoffs, and deliverables. An example of a policy in could be… “All Incidents must be logged”. Policies are rules that govern the process. Process Owner ensures that all Process activities, (what to do), Procedures (details on how to perform the activity) and the