Skip to main content

Pain Management

Picture this: A patient walks into the doctor’s office and says “doc, every time I raise my arm it hurts”.  Of course you know the punch line.   But can you see the analogy?    Fill in the blank:  Every time we _____, our customers/services/users hurt (how?) 

To identify and improve pain areas, you must analyze the overall performance and capabilities of your services, processes, people, partners and underpinning technology.  Do you know how they support desired business outcomes and where they fall short?   
The first step is to identify the “as-is” state in order to document current performance and justify the need for improvement.   Part of this step will involve determining what needs to be measured and who is going to collect, process, analyze and synthesize the data into useable information.  Key stakeholders will need to be identified and engaged in order to understand the intensity of their pain, the residual impact and their input into possible opportunities for improvement.

The “as-is” state can serve as a launchpad for envisioning and documenting the desired “to be” state.  A gap analysis between the two will serve as the basis for building a strategic plan for improvement
Improvement requires resources (human, technical and financial).   To justify the improvement, a business case will need to be developed that describes both the pain and potential remedies.   Business cases must speak to value - as both return on investment and value on investment.  It must be aligned to customer goals and objectives.   And it must speak to risk - the risk of making the improvement and the risk of not making the improvement.     
Pain is unpleasant.  And unfortunately, many of us choose to live with the pain instead of identifying ways to lessen or eliminate it.    But pain can be managed - both medically and corporately.  You just have to be willing to acknowledge it and commit to reducing or eliminating it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Four Ps of Service Design - It’s not all about Technology

People ask me why I think that many designs and projects often fail. The most common answer is from a lack of preparation and management. Many IT organizations just think about the technology (product) implementation and fail to understand the risks of not planning for the effective and efficient use of the four Ps: People, Process, Products (services, technology and tools) and Partners (suppliers, manufacturers and vendors). A holistic approach should be adopted for all Service Design aspects and areas to ensure consistency and integration within all activities and processes across the entire IT environment, providing end to end business-related functionality and quality. (SD 2.4.2) People:   Have to have proper skills and possess the necessary competencies in order to get involved in the provision of IT services. The right skills, the right knowledge, the right level of experience must be kept current and aligned to the business needs. Products:   These are the technology managem

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group .   As a service provider, we can’t stop there!   We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer.     Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include:     Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods.   Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service then toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you.   You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you.               Note: Goods may not always be provided for every Service Offe

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

I was recently asked to clarify the roles of the Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner and wanted to share this with you. Roles and Responsibilities: Process Owner – this individual is “Accountable” for the process. They are the goto person and represent this process across the entire organization. They will ensure that the process is clearly defined, designed and documented. They will ensure that the process has a set of Policies for governance. Example: The process owner for Incident management will ensure that all of the activities to Identify, Record, Categorize, Investigate, … all the way to closing the incident are defined and documented with clearly defined roles, responsibilities, handoffs, and deliverables. An example of a policy in could be… “All Incidents must be logged”. Policies are rules that govern the process. Process Owner ensures that all Process activities, (what to do), Procedures (details on how to perform the activity) and the