Skip to main content

The Best of Service Strategy, Part 4

Cycles
Originally Published December 4, 2012


As we move into the waning of the year in the northern hemisphere and the waxing of the year in the southern hemisphere, it becomes time to reflect on the meaning and understanding of the idea of cycles. The yearly cycle of seasons was long ago recognized by early mankind as playing a significant role in culture and society. Planting, growth, maturity and harvesting each set the day to day activities of peoples around the globe throughout a given year. This is no less true when it comes to the lifecycle of services and the lifecycle of Service Management. Both play a significant part in the culture and functioning of an organization.

A cycle is defined as “any complete round or series of occurrences that repeats or is repeated.” This definition holds true for service management and IT services. When it comes to providing value through IT services and governing, controlling and managing those services, we do not exist in a “once and done” or “set and forget” world. We live in what I call a“rinse and repeat” world based on ongoing cycles. The key principle of a cycle is that it is repeated (often over and over again into the future with no planned end). For IT organizations this calls for us to look at things in the long term (cyclical) in addition to the short term (deliverables and results).
As part of Service Strategy an IT organization should incorporate long term cyclical perspectives into the vision, mission, goals and objectives of providing value to the business and end customers. There are daily, weekly, monthly, yearly and even decade long cycles that should be incorporated into the planning for the future. The most straightforward approach to cyclical planning is the Deming Cycle (Plan-Do-Check-Act). Incorporating the PDCA cycle into planning, an organization can set the tone and approach for all cyclical activities throughout the lifecycle of a service. Yes we are talking about using cycles inside of other cycles! The idea is that the effort of providing value to customers and the business through a service lifecycle is never done. It simply revolves back to the beginning of the cycle.
As a result, the phrase “we want to be evolutionary, not revolutionary” is really a misconception. A revolution is a cycle (one complete rotation of the cyclical activities). Evolution is the long term effects of a series of repeated revolutions (cycles). So to be evolutionary, an organization must be revolutionary (or cyclical) first! This is one of the main concepts from Continual Service Improvement—gradual change over time (revolutions and cycles), lead to more significant results in the long run (evolution).
By seeing that ITSM and the best practices frameworks promote a cyclical view in both short term and long term thinking, an organization can replace ad hoc, on-the-fly work and results with repeatable, standardized and consistent results for the business and the customer.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

I was recently asked to clarify the roles of the Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner and wanted to share this with you.

Roles and Responsibilities:
Process Owner – this individual is “Accountable” for the process. They are the goto person and represent this process across the entire organization. They will ensure that the process is clearly defined, designed and documented. They will ensure that the process has a set of Policies for governance.Example: The process owner for Incident management will ensure that all of the activities to Identify, Record, Categorize, Investigate, … all the way to closing the incident are defined and documented with clearly defined roles, responsibilities, handoffs, and deliverables. An example of a policy in could be… “All Incidents must be logged”. Policies are rules that govern the process. Process Owner ensures that all Process activities, (what to do), Procedures (details on how to perform the activity) and the policies (r…

How Does ITIL Help in the Management of the SDLC?

I was recently asked how ITIL helps in the management of the SDLC (Software Development Lifecycle).  Simply put... SDLC is a Lifecycle approach to produce the software or the "product".  ITIL is a Lifecycle approach that focuses on the "service".
I’ll start by reviewing both SDLC and ITIL Lifecycles and then summarize:
SDLC  -  The intent of an SDLC process is to help produce a product that is cost-efficient, effective and of high quality. Once an application is created, the SDLC maps the proper deployment of the software into the live environment. The SDLC methodology usually contains the following stages: Analysis (requirements and design), construction, testing, release and maintenance.  The focus here is on the Software.  Most organizations will use an Agile or Waterfall approach to implement the software through the Software Development Lifecycle.
ITIL  -  is a best practice for IT service management (ITSM) that focuses on aligning IT services with the needs …

Incidents when a Defect is Involved

Question: We currently track defects in a separate system than our ticket management system. With that said, my question is does anyone have suggestions and/or best practices on how to handle incidents when a defect is involved? Should the incident be closed since the defect is being worked on in another defect tracking system if it is noted in the incident ticket? I am considering creating an incident statuses of 'closed-unresolved' so the incident can still be reported on in our ticket management system but know it is being worked on/tracked in the defect system. With defects, it is possible that we may never work on them because they are very low priority and the impact is low to the user. However, in some cases a defect is being worked on. Should we create a problem ticket instead?
Thanks, René W.

Answer: RenĂ©. In ITIL, the activity you are describing is handled by the Problem Management process. ITIL does not use the term “defect” but it does use the term “known error” to…