Skip to main content

Problem, Incident and Change Management Integration

Problem Management seeks to minimize the adverse impact of incidents and problems on the business that are caused by underlying errors within the IT infrastructure and to proactively prevent the recurrence of incidents related to those errors.  In order to achieve this, Problem Management seeks to get to the root cause of incidents, document and communicate known errors and to initiate actions to improve or correct the situation”.  
Given that statement is directly from the ITIL Best Management Practices text, it’s a wonder more organizations don’t have well integrated Problem, Incident and Change processes in their organizations.

I never want to say that there is a single silver bullet solution for a given problem and I’m not suggesting that here.  However having a solid CMS (Configuration Management System) is a good step in the right direction.   Of course before we even think of tools we must have rules.  Thinking holistically we can create an integrated set of best practices across process boundaries. This will allow us to:
  • Optimize processes and ensure their use through standardized models that can effectively guide analyst through best practice for Incident, Problem and Change management.
  • Reduce resolution times by cutting across process boundaries, to ensure that the right information and knowledge is properly communicated and escalated to the correct stakeholders.

Problem Management ensures that all resolutions or workarounds that require a change to a configuration item are submitted through Change Management and implemented through a Request for Change. Change Management will monitor the progress of these changes and keep Problem Management informed. 

Problem Management can also play a significant role in the Change Advisory Board (CAB).  Working in conjunction with Incident management, Problem Management can also be involved in resolving incidents caused by failed changes. For some incidents, it will be applicable to involve Problem Management to investigate and resolve the underlying cause to prevent or reduce the impact of recurrence. Incident Management provides a point where these are reported. Problem Management, in return, can provide known errors for faster incident resolution through workarounds that can be used to restore service.

We can also use the Incident Management process as check on change.  Having the Service desk aware of the change schedule will allow it to be able to detect incidents caused by changes and create the appropriate relationships in the CMS. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

I was recently asked to clarify the roles of the Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner and wanted to share this with you.

Roles and Responsibilities:
Process Owner – this individual is “Accountable” for the process. They are the goto person and represent this process across the entire organization. They will ensure that the process is clearly defined, designed and documented. They will ensure that the process has a set of Policies for governance.Example: The process owner for Incident management will ensure that all of the activities to Identify, Record, Categorize, Investigate, … all the way to closing the incident are defined and documented with clearly defined roles, responsibilities, handoffs, and deliverables. An example of a policy in could be… “All Incidents must be logged”. Policies are rules that govern the process. Process Owner ensures that all Process activities, (what to do), Procedures (details on how to perform the activity) and the policies (r…

How Does ITIL Help in the Management of the SDLC?

I was recently asked how ITIL helps in the management of the SDLC (Software Development Lifecycle).  Simply put... SDLC is a Lifecycle approach to produce the software or the "product".  ITIL is a Lifecycle approach that focuses on the "service".
I’ll start by reviewing both SDLC and ITIL Lifecycles and then summarize:
SDLC  -  The intent of an SDLC process is to help produce a product that is cost-efficient, effective and of high quality. Once an application is created, the SDLC maps the proper deployment of the software into the live environment. The SDLC methodology usually contains the following stages: Analysis (requirements and design), construction, testing, release and maintenance.  The focus here is on the Software.  Most organizations will use an Agile or Waterfall approach to implement the software through the Software Development Lifecycle.
ITIL  -  is a best practice for IT service management (ITSM) that focuses on aligning IT services with the needs …

Incidents when a Defect is Involved

Question: We currently track defects in a separate system than our ticket management system. With that said, my question is does anyone have suggestions and/or best practices on how to handle incidents when a defect is involved? Should the incident be closed since the defect is being worked on in another defect tracking system if it is noted in the incident ticket? I am considering creating an incident statuses of 'closed-unresolved' so the incident can still be reported on in our ticket management system but know it is being worked on/tracked in the defect system. With defects, it is possible that we may never work on them because they are very low priority and the impact is low to the user. However, in some cases a defect is being worked on. Should we create a problem ticket instead?
Thanks, René W.

Answer: RenĂ©. In ITIL, the activity you are describing is handled by the Problem Management process. ITIL does not use the term “defect” but it does use the term “known error” to…