Utility and Warranty

If you are in the position of providing IT services to customers then you know the importance of the statement: Utility plus Warranty equals Value (U+W=V). So when we talk about value, we must consider who determines that value and what are the components that go into making up the agreements that will define how value gets created and delivered. The value of a service is normally defined as “the level of service that meets customer expectations” and is often measured by how much the customer is willing to pay for the service. An industry trend today that may have been excluded in the past is the ability of the service provider to be able to define and document the costs involved in providing that service beyond its core value.

Services being intangible and unlike products do not have much inherent value. This value does not get realized until the service is actually utilized and enables someone to create the desired business outcome, which means that the provider of the service does not determine the value. This is performed by the stakeholder who decides how they will engage the service and determines the return they achieve by using it.

For the customer it is about utility (fitness for purpose) and warranty (fitness for use) and how the service provider can make these two elements come together to realize the desired outcomes and which the customer uses for the bases of their perception of the service and its value.

“Utility”, or what functionality the service delivers, is used to define what the service is able to do and its ability to meet required outcomes. It also talks to how it enhances the customer or business assets and its ability to improve the desired business results.

So the catch is that I can have a service with phenomenal utility, but if it isn’t balance with the correct levels of warranty (FFU), my customers will be sitting dead in the water waiting for my service to become available. They will also be concerned with, will it be continuous, secure and have enough capacity to meet the dynamic levels of demand I plan on engaging in? We as a service provider must be able to balance both utility (FFP) and warranty (FFU). It is critically important that when we define and document the service and the customer requirements, that a holistic picture of both functionality and performance is taken into consideration when setting realistic expectations with our customers.

In addition to education opportunities be sure to check out some of the resources at this site for ongoing improvement of Service Strategy: http://www.itsmacademy.com/itil-lifecycle-course-service-strategy-accredited/?page_context=category&faceted_search=0

Comments

The Four Ps of Service Design - It’s not all about Technology

People ask me why I think that many designs and projects often fail. The most common answer is from a lack of preparation and management. Many IT organizations just think about the technology (product) implementation and fail to understand the risks of not planning for the effective and efficient use of the four Ps: People, Process, Products (services, technology and tools) and Partners (suppliers, manufacturers and vendors). A holistic approach should be adopted for all Service Design aspects and areas to ensure consistency and integration within all activities and processes across the entire IT environment, providing end to end business-related functionality and quality. (SD 2.4.2) People: Have to have proper skills and possess the necessary competencies in order to get involved in the provision of IT services. The right skills, the right knowledge, the right level of experience must be kept current and aligned to the business needs. Products: These are the technology managem

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group . As a service provider, we can’t stop there! We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer. Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include: Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods. Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service then toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you. You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you. Note: Goods may not always be provided for every Service Offe

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

I was recently asked to clarify the roles of the Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner and wanted to share this with you. Roles and Responsibilities: Process Owner – this individual is “Accountable” for the process. They are the goto person and represent this process across the entire organization. They will ensure that the process is clearly defined, designed and documented. They will ensure that the process has a set of Policies for governance. Example: The process owner for Incident management will ensure that all of the activities to Identify, Record, Categorize, Investigate, … all the way to closing the incident are defined and documented with clearly defined roles, responsibilities, handoffs, and deliverables. An example of a policy in could be… “All Incidents must be logged”. Policies are rules that govern the process. Process Owner ensures that all Process activities, (what to do), Procedures (details on how to perform the activity) and the

Search