Skip to main content

Your Process Is Either Improving or Deteriorating

Do you ever notice you can hear things over and over and then there is that one moment where a comment or phrase all of a sudden shouts at you with real meaning and significance? I’d like to share one of those aha moments with you. I recently took a class called Certified Agile Process Owner (CAPO). During that class the instructor, Donna Knapp responded to a learner and said … 
“Remember that your process is either improving or it is deteriorating”. 
For some reason while thinking about that from an Agile Service Management perspective I thought REALLY?! That is so very true. If we think about it, by the time we define, deploy and utilize any set of process activities the objectives could change, the technology used certainly has changed and the overall requirements for any one of those process activities or procedures could have changed.

Today we all know that business requirements are dynamic. All the more reason for taking an iterative approach to process design. For those of you that understand how taking an iterative approach to software development brings value, the idea and concepts are the same. I learned that each process is built and potentially released in small, frequent increments. New procedures and behaviors are introduced gradually, providing greater opportunity for normalization as well more frequent feedback and input to guide the future direction of the process. The Agile Service Management Guide also states that, dependent increments can be built simultaneously or in succession. Most importantly, the organization can test the boundaries of “just enough” process throughout the service lifecycle.

While considering ITIL best practice guidance I thought that this is what ongoing CSI is really all about? Agile Principles and Scrum allow us to optimize our ITSM processes in an efficient manner. Agile Service Management is agnostic when it comes to frameworks and best practice. It is clear that elements of LEAN, DevOps, ITIL, Scrum and Agile can all be leveraged for the two main aspects of Agile Service Management, those two being “Process Design” and “Process Improvement”. Hmmm… If my process is deteriorating is it dying? An iterative and incremental approach to process design allows ITSM processes to mature organically and holistically. Let’s do the right things right, improve rather than deteriorate and consider Agile Service Management. It is the next logical step.

Learn the skills needed to help make your IT Operations more Agile
Certified Agile Service Manager (CASM) and Certified Agile Process Owner (CAPO)  

To see all ITSM Academy's Agile Service Management offerings:
http://www.itsmacademy.com/agile/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

I was recently asked to clarify the roles of the Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner and wanted to share this with you.

Roles and Responsibilities:
Process Owner – this individual is “Accountable” for the process. They are the goto person and represent this process across the entire organization. They will ensure that the process is clearly defined, designed and documented. They will ensure that the process has a set of Policies for governance.Example: The process owner for Incident management will ensure that all of the activities to Identify, Record, Categorize, Investigate, … all the way to closing the incident are defined and documented with clearly defined roles, responsibilities, handoffs, and deliverables. An example of a policy in could be… “All Incidents must be logged”. Policies are rules that govern the process. Process Owner ensures that all Process activities, (what to do), Procedures (details on how to perform the activity) and the policies (r…

How Does ITIL Help in the Management of the SDLC?

I was recently asked how ITIL helps in the management of the SDLC (Software Development Lifecycle).  Simply put... SDLC is a Lifecycle approach to produce the software or the "product".  ITIL is a Lifecycle approach that focuses on the "service".
I’ll start by reviewing both SDLC and ITIL Lifecycles and then summarize:
SDLC  -  The intent of an SDLC process is to help produce a product that is cost-efficient, effective and of high quality. Once an application is created, the SDLC maps the proper deployment of the software into the live environment. The SDLC methodology usually contains the following stages: Analysis (requirements and design), construction, testing, release and maintenance.  The focus here is on the Software.  Most organizations will use an Agile or Waterfall approach to implement the software through the Software Development Lifecycle.
ITIL  -  is a best practice for IT service management (ITSM) that focuses on aligning IT services with the needs …

Incidents when a Defect is Involved

Question: We currently track defects in a separate system than our ticket management system. With that said, my question is does anyone have suggestions and/or best practices on how to handle incidents when a defect is involved? Should the incident be closed since the defect is being worked on in another defect tracking system if it is noted in the incident ticket? I am considering creating an incident statuses of 'closed-unresolved' so the incident can still be reported on in our ticket management system but know it is being worked on/tracked in the defect system. With defects, it is possible that we may never work on them because they are very low priority and the impact is low to the user. However, in some cases a defect is being worked on. Should we create a problem ticket instead?
Thanks, René W.

Answer: RenĂ©. In ITIL, the activity you are describing is handled by the Problem Management process. ITIL does not use the term “defect” but it does use the term “known error” to…