To Collaborate or To Compromise … Which Is Best?

The people factor and your ability to absorb change could and does make all the difference for IT service providers. Most IT practitioners will agree that “change” requires some organizational change management. Organizational Change Management (OCM) is the process of preparing, motivating and equipping people to meet new business challenges. Conflict can be looked upon as good! Embrace conflict don’t ignore or avoid it because it is necessary to listen to conflicting opinions that may not have been considered. Learning to use different conflict modes helps to move forward and increase engagement that could make your organizational change a success.

The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument is a tool for helping people understand how different conflict-handling styles affect interpersonal and group dynamics and for empowering them to choose the appropriate style for any situation. I was studying this in preparation for an “Organizational Change Management” workshop and had an ah-ha moment regarding the use of “Collaborating” vs. “Compromising”.

It always appeared to me that compromising was good. Jayne Groll, President of ITSM Academy, explained that compromising is not bad but perhaps “collaborating” would be better. This makes perfect sense when we think about the fact that when you compromise someone is giving up something. That means that someone “loses” some and that another “wins” more. There is an agreement or “compromise” on this win/loss solution but a “Win” and “Loss” none the less. Now let’s consider “collaboration”. Collaborating is both assertive and cooperative. Collaborating involves an attempt to work with others to find some solution that fully satisfies their concerns. It means digging into an issue to pinpoint the underlying needs and wants of the two individuals. Collaborating between two persons might take the form of exploring a disagreement to learn from each other's insights or trying to find a creative solution to an interpersonal problem. The greatest benefit is that “collaboration” ensures a win/win solution.

So should we “Collaborate” or “Compromise”? The answer is yes. The challenge is to know the difference between these and other conflict-handling styles and when to use them to ensure your strategic initiatives.

To learn more:

http://www.itsmacademy.com/orgchange/

https://www.cpp.com/products/tki/index.aspx

Comments

The Four Ps of Service Design - It’s not all about Technology

People ask me why I think that many designs and projects often fail. The most common answer is from a lack of preparation and management. Many IT organizations just think about the technology (product) implementation and fail to understand the risks of not planning for the effective and efficient use of the four Ps: People, Process, Products (services, technology and tools) and Partners (suppliers, manufacturers and vendors). A holistic approach should be adopted for all Service Design aspects and areas to ensure consistency and integration within all activities and processes across the entire IT environment, providing end to end business-related functionality and quality. (SD 2.4.2) People: Have to have proper skills and possess the necessary competencies in order to get involved in the provision of IT services. The right skills, the right knowledge, the right level of experience must be kept current and aligned to the business needs. Products: These are the technology managem

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group . As a service provider, we can’t stop there! We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer. Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include: Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods. Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service then toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you. You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you. Note: Goods may not always be provided for every Service Offe

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

I was recently asked to clarify the roles of the Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner and wanted to share this with you. Roles and Responsibilities: Process Owner – this individual is “Accountable” for the process. They are the goto person and represent this process across the entire organization. They will ensure that the process is clearly defined, designed and documented. They will ensure that the process has a set of Policies for governance. Example: The process owner for Incident management will ensure that all of the activities to Identify, Record, Categorize, Investigate, … all the way to closing the incident are defined and documented with clearly defined roles, responsibilities, handoffs, and deliverables. An example of a policy in could be… “All Incidents must be logged”. Policies are rules that govern the process. Process Owner ensures that all Process activities, (what to do), Procedures (details on how to perform the activity) and the

Search