As a follow-up to post regarding
the blur between development and service management, a reader commented that
DevOps seems to represent a long standing tradition of incremental delivery. In that case, the reader asks
“How is incremental delivery tracked and managed in an
ITIL framework? Would these initial requests for capability tracked as Requests
and ultimately as a Request for Change?”
As you can imagine, the answer is “it
depends”.
An organization can choose to have multiple RFCs submitted or have a single RFC that decomposes into multiple releases but is managed as a single project.
Regardless, the incremental delivery
addressed in DevOps is much faster than it was in the past – therefore requiring
a tighter integration between development and operations teams – they must
communicate well, use shared vocabulary and more importantly, shared metrics
and dashboards. Teams that are tightly
integrated will have higher rates of rapid change success – so much so that
their changes can be categorized in the ITIL processes as “standard” and move
through the change and release process almost instantaneously.
Error
detection, monitoring and metrics dashboards will be the window that both sides
view to alert them to any apparent incidents and problems related to these
frequent changes.
The critical success
factors are a standard prioritization scheme, good monitoring, metrics and
error-checking capabilities and appropriate levels of change record or documentation (so
that we can answer the “what’s changed?” question if incidents or problems
arise).
If there is less risk and more
reward as well as a clear threshold for more or less change management rigor, then
the RFC would be managed as a standard change. No request necessary.
.
.
Comments