Skip to main content

The Best of Service Transition, Part 4

Image
By

Prioritizing Changes
Originally Published in 2011

The Professor recently received the following question:
Having put together a spreadsheet of information that I need to assess the impact of a change,  what I need to do next is figure out how to assess the impact of a change as being high, medium, or low? Any guidance you can give me on how to do this would be greatly appreciated.”
The  Service Transition book provides great guidance on assessing the impact of changes (ST 4.2.6.4). This section provides 7 questions that must be answered to fully understand the impact. Many of these questions are answered using information in your spreadsheet. Others you may want to consider adding. 
  • Who RAISED the change?
  • What is the REASON for the change?
  • What is the RETURN required from the change?
  • What are the RISKS involved in the change?
  • What RESOURCES are required to deliver the change?
  • Who is RESPONSIBLE for the build, test and implementation of the change?
  • What is the RELATIONSHIP between this change and other changes?
You can then develop guidelines/a matrix that categorizes the impact based on the answers.

The Microsoft Operations Framework (MOF) Change and Configuration Service Management Function (Table 6) gives the following guidelines for prioritizing changes based on business impact, urgency and required resources:
  • Low. The change can wait until the next scheduled release.
  • Medium. Because of its impact level, the change cannot wait until the next scheduled release.
  • High. The change needs to be released as soon as it is complete and has been tested.
  • Emergency. The change needs to be released as soon as possible; many of the approval and the development steps are abbreviated.
NOTE: If your organization has too many "emergency" and "high priority" changes, this may indicate that staff are avoiding the process or that the process is not effective.
 
ITIL and MOF also factor in risk when assessing changes and looks at both change impact, and the probability of that impact. For example, a change that has the possibility of high impact and also the probability of high impact will be the highest category of risk. High impact, low probability, the next highest category, and so forth. 
Labels:

Comments

Rusty said…
I was looking for terms used for categorizing the impact of a change, I remember in Version 2 of ITIL that changes where categorized as Major, Significant, Minor and Standard is that no longer done? Or is the Imapct also defines as the priority High, Medium, and Low
June 8, 2010 at 4:36 PM
Professor P. Ross S. Wise said…
Hi Rusty, The Professor posted a blog yesterday answering your question. Thanks for submitting it.
June 10, 2010 at 4:19 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Four Service Characteristics

By
Recently I came across several articles by researchers and experts that laid out definitions and characteristics of services. ITIL provides us with a definition that can help drive the creation of value-laden services: A means of delivering value to customers by facilitating outcomes customers want to achieve without the ownership of specific costs and risks. An area that ITIL is not so clear is in terms of service characteristics. Several researchers and experts put forth that services have four basic characteristics (IHIP): Intangibility—Services are the results of actions not things. They have no physical presence and represent a logical set of elements. One way to think of service is “work done for others.”  Heterogeneity—Also known as “variability”; services are unique items because of the mechanisms used to deliver services, which is people. Because the people element adds variability, the service is variable. This holds true, especially for the value proposition—not eve...
Post a Comment
Read more

From the Four Ps to the Four Dimensions: ITIL (Version 5)

By
By Donna Knapp  and Lisa Schwartz For years, people , process , and technology (PPT) provided a widely recognized framework for balancing and integrating the components needed to achieve effective performance and outcomes. In the ITIL v3 Service Design publication, this perspective expanded to the four Ps: people , processes , products , and partners . ITIL 4 developed these ideas further through the four dimensions of service management. ITIL (Version 5) carries the same four dimensions forward into digital product and service management, emphasizing their importance throughout the product and service lifecycle. The four dimensions are: Organizations and people Information and technology Partners and suppliers Value streams and processes These dimensions provide complementary perspectives for managing digital products and services. They apply across the ITIL Value System, including its management practices and the activities through which products and ser...
Post a Comment
Read more

What Is A Service Offering?

By
The ITIL 4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group.   As a service provider, we can’t stop there!   We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer.     Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include:     Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions 1. Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods.   Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service then toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you.   You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you.      ...
Post a Comment
Read more