Skip to main content

Cloud Services and Warranty Processes

As business organizations opt for support from the cloud to provision Software, Platform, or Infrastructure services the need for warranty through the service value chain becomes paramount. Service warranty is gained by achieving specified levels of availability, capacity, continuity, and security. 
The dynamic, nature of the business and varied demand from multiple customers and user profiles must be considered when defining and investing in cloud architectures.  Each customer will expect that only their application or service will be delivered to users when in fact multiple customer and user communities could be leverage from the scalability and shared resources in the cloud.

Availability/Capacity and the Cloud

Service providers must gain assurance that multiple instances of the same application are delivered in a scalable manner.  In order to ensure availability and leverage capacity on demand additional tools and technologies such as load balancing, server virtualization, application delivery controllers and more will be necessary to integrate deep into the infrastructure, back end systems and network.   All of this is disguised or invisible to the customer as the “Cloud”.  Considerations from the business side will have to ensure that the transition of any new or changed services are enabled via a combination of both internal and external services.  Therefore; designing, delivering and managing the end to end service delivery through the value chain still needs to be addressed. 

Service Level Management and the Cloud

The Service Level agreements will only deliver if underpinning contracts for cloud services support business and customer requirements.  With cloud computing the responsibility and integration points shift.  Internal sourcing shifts to the cloud provider.   Metrics for scalability, availability and security will require monitoring and reporting on caching, compression, rate shaping and other cloud unique elements in order to ensure availability and Service Level Requirements.  Inaccurate or incomplete contracts with the cloud provider could jeopardize the cost savings, business benefit and value that is expected from the cloud.

Cloudy days ahead

The flight to the cloud continues to evolve as an advantageous means of sourcing.  When managed correctly cloud services can increase the cadence and velocity of service delivery to meet dynamic business demand.   Even though cloud computing in all its variants is still evolving, unified Service Level Agreements and Underpinning Contracts with a focus on people and relationship management  help ensure the cloud computing environment is always fast, secure, and highly available. The heart of service management withstands evolution and is still vital. The accountability for provisioning Availability, Capacity, Continuity and Security still lies with the service provider.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

I was recently asked to clarify the roles of the Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner and wanted to share this with you.

Roles and Responsibilities:
Process Owner – this individual is “Accountable” for the process. They are the goto person and represent this process across the entire organization. They will ensure that the process is clearly defined, designed and documented. They will ensure that the process has a set of Policies for governance.Example: The process owner for Incident management will ensure that all of the activities to Identify, Record, Categorize, Investigate, … all the way to closing the incident are defined and documented with clearly defined roles, responsibilities, handoffs, and deliverables. An example of a policy in could be… “All Incidents must be logged”. Policies are rules that govern the process. Process Owner ensures that all Process activities, (what to do), Procedures (details on how to perform the activity) and the policies (r…

How Does ITIL Help in the Management of the SDLC?

I was recently asked how ITIL helps in the management of the SDLC (Software Development Lifecycle).  Simply put... SDLC is a Lifecycle approach to produce the software or the "product".  ITIL is a Lifecycle approach that focuses on the "service".
I’ll start by reviewing both SDLC and ITIL Lifecycles and then summarize:
SDLC  -  The intent of an SDLC process is to help produce a product that is cost-efficient, effective and of high quality. Once an application is created, the SDLC maps the proper deployment of the software into the live environment. The SDLC methodology usually contains the following stages: Analysis (requirements and design), construction, testing, release and maintenance.  The focus here is on the Software.  Most organizations will use an Agile or Waterfall approach to implement the software through the Software Development Lifecycle.
ITIL  -  is a best practice for IT service management (ITSM) that focuses on aligning IT services with the needs …

Incidents when a Defect is Involved

Question: We currently track defects in a separate system than our ticket management system. With that said, my question is does anyone have suggestions and/or best practices on how to handle incidents when a defect is involved? Should the incident be closed since the defect is being worked on in another defect tracking system if it is noted in the incident ticket? I am considering creating an incident statuses of 'closed-unresolved' so the incident can still be reported on in our ticket management system but know it is being worked on/tracked in the defect system. With defects, it is possible that we may never work on them because they are very low priority and the impact is low to the user. However, in some cases a defect is being worked on. Should we create a problem ticket instead?
Thanks, René W.

Answer: RenĂ©. In ITIL, the activity you are describing is handled by the Problem Management process. ITIL does not use the term “defect” but it does use the term “known error” to…