Skip to main content

DevOps Test Monitoring Strategy

The combination of continuous monitoring with continuous testing and analytic tools can provide a broader strategic view of test results.  This view is necessary to collect, aggregate and organize test data that enables a gain in confidence for each release. 

Key Concepts for Realizing Your Test Monitoring Strategy:

Determine continuous test monitoring priorities: Some examples of problems that continuous test monitoring can help with include intermittent failures caused by marginal designs, marginal test designs, environmental condition changes not detected by individual tests, memory leaks, varying starting conditions, interactions with other systems, system topologies and performance degradation within the margin of a test. These can and will accumulate over time. The best practice for continuous monitoring indicates that the problems of most concern to a specific product or DevOps environment will be monitored.

Regression test product areas even though there were no expected changes:One not so good practice is to skip tests for areas that are “known“ or those that have not changed during individual test cycles. Unintended consequences of indirect changes may impact performance, so a regression suite should audit these areas occasionally just to be sure. Typical examples that are often caught by this are features important audit functions, system backwards compatibility and those that could disrupt critical business operation.

Select continuous test monitoring tools that collect and report trends:Tools that can correlate and report test results across multiple dimensions such as test cases, product features, system performance categories, build versions, releases and functional tags can find intermittent bugs or problem trends. Thresholds, email alerts and dashboards that highlight short-term results views from long-term results views are especially valuable.

Use continuous test monitoring results to diagnose and resolve problems:Once a diagnosis is determined, the root cause can be verified through targeted retest cases that set all the conditions in accordance with the diagnosis. Once confirmed then the offending design can be refactored to handle or avoid the failure condition.

A Test Monitoring Strategy with a holistic view is critical for test results evaluation over multiple releases. Intermittent failures and problems only become apparent when test results are presented as trends over a long-term trend. Failures are easier to diagnose when a large data set is accumulated and filtered. Take action. Get a test strategy that includes a Test Monitoring Strategy that works.

Inspire & educate…

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Four Ps of Service Design - It’s not all about Technology

People ask me why I think that many designs and projects often fail. The most common answer is from a lack of preparation and management. Many IT organizations just think about the technology (product) implementation and fail to understand the risks of not planning for the effective and efficient use of the four Ps: People, Process, Products (services, technology and tools) and Partners (suppliers, manufacturers and vendors). A holistic approach should be adopted for all Service Design aspects and areas to ensure consistency and integration within all activities and processes across the entire IT environment, providing end to end business-related functionality and quality. (SD 2.4.2) People:   Have to have proper skills and possess the necessary competencies in order to get involved in the provision of IT services. The right skills, the right knowledge, the right level of experience must be kept current and aligned to the business needs. Products:   These are the technology managem

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group .   As a service provider, we can’t stop there!   We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer.     Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include:     Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods.   Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service then toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you.   You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you.               Note: Goods may not always be provided for every Service Offe

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

I was recently asked to clarify the roles of the Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner and wanted to share this with you. Roles and Responsibilities: Process Owner – this individual is “Accountable” for the process. They are the goto person and represent this process across the entire organization. They will ensure that the process is clearly defined, designed and documented. They will ensure that the process has a set of Policies for governance. Example: The process owner for Incident management will ensure that all of the activities to Identify, Record, Categorize, Investigate, … all the way to closing the incident are defined and documented with clearly defined roles, responsibilities, handoffs, and deliverables. An example of a policy in could be… “All Incidents must be logged”. Policies are rules that govern the process. Process Owner ensures that all Process activities, (what to do), Procedures (details on how to perform the activity) and the