Skip to main content

Achieving ITSM Balance

In speaking with colleagues and practitioners, I have found that one of the greatest difficulties for companies to overcome in a Service Management implementation is the desire to be more complex and unbalanced than is absolutely necessary. One of the most basic and underlying elements of good Service Management is the achievement of balance in how we approach the delivery of value to the customers and users through services. Balance helps us to find an equitable point that brings value to the customers and users without throwing out the efforts and actions needed to keep IT going.

When I speak of balance, I am referring to finding the middle ground between extremes. These include balances like the amount of time and effort spent between Incident Management and Problem Management; or perhaps the balance between flexibility and stability; or even the challenges of being proactive versus reactive; customer/service-centric versus technology-centric. There are a multitude of these types of balances and challenges that face an organization trying to use the best practices of Service Management.

An old adage states that “the squeaky wheel gets the grease”. This is true in IT as much as anywhere. We turn our attention to those things and tasks that make the most noise or those people who have the loudest voice. As humans we want to please others. It gives us satisfaction, praise and rewards. However, in simply trying to satisfy every need as quickly as possible in the easiest, most cost effective and timely way we are actually often throwing things out of balance. Sometimes it takes a hard choice to go down the “road less traveled” to find a more stable and effective, efficient and economical balance that brings the greatest value to the customers and users, but does not bring instant gratification.

We could spend all of our time doing Incident Management and resolving service issues and putting out “fires”. But this means a choice not to do Problem Management and gain the benefits of finding problems before they appear or stopping Incidents from constantly recurring. If we put all our time to finding root cause, we will have unresolved issues that impact the value we promised to the customers and users. So the best option is to find a balance between Incident Management and Problem Management that will allow us to resolve issues while spending some of our time being proactive with future potential problems.

To better achieve these benefits of balance we must do several things:
  • Identify opposing views or ideas or action sets that exist within our organizations
  • Determine the balance or middle ground between the extremes for our individual organizations
  • Identify actions we can take now to move towards that middle ground or balance point
  • Put those actions into place
  • Continually improve by looking for more balances to achieve

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Four Ps of Service Design - It’s not all about Technology

People ask me why I think that many designs and projects often fail. The most common answer is from a lack of preparation and management. Many IT organizations just think about the technology (product) implementation and fail to understand the risks of not planning for the effective and efficient use of the four Ps: People, Process, Products (services, technology and tools) and Partners (suppliers, manufacturers and vendors). A holistic approach should be adopted for all Service Design aspects and areas to ensure consistency and integration within all activities and processes across the entire IT environment, providing end to end business-related functionality and quality. (SD 2.4.2) People:   Have to have proper skills and possess the necessary competencies in order to get involved in the provision of IT services. The right skills, the right knowledge, the right level of experience must be kept current and aligned to the business needs. Products:   These are the technology managem

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group .   As a service provider, we can’t stop there!   We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer.     Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include:     Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods.   Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service than toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you.   You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you.               Note: Goods may not always be provided for every Service

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

I was recently asked to clarify the roles of the Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner and wanted to share this with you. Roles and Responsibilities: Process Owner – this individual is “Accountable” for the process. They are the goto person and represent this process across the entire organization. They will ensure that the process is clearly defined, designed and documented. They will ensure that the process has a set of Policies for governance. Example: The process owner for Incident management will ensure that all of the activities to Identify, Record, Categorize, Investigate, … all the way to closing the incident are defined and documented with clearly defined roles, responsibilities, handoffs, and deliverables.  An example of a policy in could be… “All Incidents must be logged”. Policies are rules that govern the process. Process Owner ensures that all Process activities, (what to do), Procedures (details on how to perform the activity) and th