Skip to main content

Juran and Quality

Several key individuals played a significant part in the creation of the movement to develop the ideas and usage of quality in the production of goods and services. Joseph Juran was one of these main contributors. His main efforts came in the form of the Quality Trilogy and the Quality Roadmap. Each of these approaches helped to set the foundational concepts and practices of achieving quality for customers.

Juran began with a basic definition of quality:
“Quality is conformance or fulfillment of customer requirements”
The Quality Trilogy states that there exist three basic stages or aspects of achieving quality:

  • Quality Planning: quality does not happen by accident
  • Quality Control: checks and balances, structure and governance ensure quality
  • Quality Improvement: we must always seek a better way to do things
Once we have our basic aspects laid out we can then create a “roadmap” or plan for attaining quality. For the delivery of goods and services we could try to create this roadmap each and every time we produce a good or service. However, in the spirit of following best practices, why not use the roadmap that Juran laid out for us?

  • Identify the customers
    • This can be more difficult than it seems. Begin with the end user and work backwards towards Operations
  • Determine the needs of those customers
    • Differentiate between needs (requirements) and demand (frequencies, volumes and durations)
  •  Translate those needs into our language 
    • In the context of ITSM that is a combination of business and technical languages
  • Develop a product that can respond to those needs
    • Design with the end user in mind
  • Optimize the product features so as to meet our needs as well as customer needs
    • Find a win-win balance for both parties
  • Develop a process which is able to produce the product
    • Make it repeatable, standardized, consistent and controlled
  • Optimize the process
    • Continual Service and Process Improvement help here
  • Prove that the process can produce the product under operating conditions
    • Gather data once the process is running , not before, then use it for improvement not punishment
  • Transfer the process to Operations
    • Follow these steps in an iterative approach to continue to drive towards quality
Many of you may recognize these steps since they are woven into ITIL best practices. ITIL serves us not only because it has been proven in the modern day, but it finds its basis in long-standing proven methods such as the work of Joseph Juran.

Comments

Juran Institute said…
Thanks for this excellent overview of Dr. Juran and his work! My name is Brian Solomon, and I'm the Communications Director for the Juran Institute, the quality consulting firm founded by Dr. Juran. Your readers can find out more about what we're doing by visiting our website, Juran.com, or our blog, The Big Q.

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

I was recently asked to clarify the roles of the Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner and wanted to share this with you. Roles and Responsibilities: Process Owner – this individual is “Accountable” for the process. They are the goto person and represent this process across the entire organization. They will ensure that the process is clearly defined, designed and documented. They will ensure that the process has a set of Policies for governance. Example: The process owner for Incident management will ensure that all of the activities to Identify, Record, Categorize, Investigate, … all the way to closing the incident are defined and documented with clearly defined roles, responsibilities, handoffs, and deliverables.  An example of a policy in could be… “All Incidents must be logged”. Policies are rules that govern the process. Process Owner ensures that all Process activities, (what to do), Procedures (details on how to perform the activity) and th

The ITIL® Maturity Model

Most organizations, especially service management organizations, strive to improve themselves. For those of us leveraging the ITIL® best practices, continual improvement is part of our DNA. We are constantly evaluating our organizations and looking for ways to improve. To aid in our improvement goals and underscore one of the major components of the ITIL Service Value System , Continual Improvement .   AXELOS has updated the ITIL Maturity Model and is offering new ITIL Assessment services. This will enable organizations to conduct evaluations and establish baselines to facilitate a continual improvement program. A while back I wrote an article on the importance of conducting an assessment . I explained the need to understand where you are before you can achieve your improvement goals. Understanding where you are deficient, how significant gaps are from your maturity objectives, and prioritizing which areas to focus on first are key to successfully improving. One method many organi

The Four Ps of Service Design - It’s not all about Technology

People ask me why I think that many designs and projects often fail. The most common answer is from a lack of preparation and management. Many IT organizations just think about the technology (product) implementation and fail to understand the risks of not planning for the effective and efficient use of the four Ps: People, Process, Products (services, technology and tools) and Partners (suppliers, manufacturers and vendors). A holistic approach should be adopted for all Service Design aspects and areas to ensure consistency and integration within all activities and processes across the entire IT environment, providing end to end business-related functionality and quality. (SD 2.4.2) People:   Have to have proper skills and possess the necessary competencies in order to get involved in the provision of IT services. The right skills, the right knowledge, the right level of experience must be kept current and aligned to the business needs. Products:   These are the technology managem