Skip to main content

The Service Design Package (SDP)

I was recently asked by one of my followers if I might have an example of a Service Design Package (SDP). 

When seeking to implement ITSM and ITIL, we often seek to find examples and models we can use to give us more guidance. This is no less true of the SDP.  Unfortunately when we try to seek out specific examples of a SDP it can often be difficult, if not near impossible. So why is it hard to find actual examples of a SDP? It goes to the very nature of the guidance of what we call best practices. ITIL is not prescriptive as to what should go into a SDP or what one might look like. It provides best practice guidance on the types of items contained, but not the exact look and feel of the content. Therefore each SDP will be unique to the organization that creates it. The organization, type of content, what the content says, and how it is managed are all decisions made by each organization to meet the needs of their customers and users. Just like a Service Catalog or a set of Service Level Agreements are unique, the SDP may not mean anything to someone outside the organization that is providing that service and has that particular group of customers or users.  It may also contain proprietary or confidential information. 

At a minimum the SDP should address the Five Aspects of Design: the services, tool, architecture, metrics and processes needed to deliver value to the business or end users. For some organizations this might be a long list of items, for others a few diagrams, lists, or tables of data and information. The SDP is a formal collection of information that moves with the service as it proceeds through its lifecycle, rather than being an odd collection of randomly associated documents. The key to a successful SDP is that it contains all the information needed by the Service Transition processes to build, test, configure, release and deploy the services and their underpinning components.





Comments

Hi 'Professor'

Spot on message. Funny how folk expect ITIL to be simply rolled out to the 'edges' of an organization just by opening the Core Publications. We have put together a series of articles entitled ' Itil in Practice' which maybe of interest to you, take a look at www.itilnews.com . If you consider it we would like to publish your SDP article.
Anyway, great article and of great value and benefit to those thinking of or are adopting ITIL best management practices.
Kind regards
Steve
Brady said…
One of the big improvements with the recent publication of ITIL 2011 is that the guidance includes a lot of templates in the appendices. At the end of Service Design are appendices that list the typical contents of an SDP, the Capacity Plan, SLAs and OLAs, Service Acceptance Criteria, etc.
Brady said…
One of the big improvements with the recent publication of ITIL 2011 is that the guidance includes a lot of templates in the appendices. At the end of Service Design are appendices that list the typical contents of an SDP, the Capacity Plan, SLAs and OLAs, Service Acceptance Criteria, etc.
Unknown said…
I'm sure many companies have examples of how they follow the "guidelines", it is neither inappropriate or impossible. The whole point is not to reinvent wheels. Surely examples do not need to be prescriptive
Unknown said…
hi,

if i am designing an app for my university in order to pay the fees and all,what would be the compliance requirements ,Architectural constraints and interface requirements in designing the service design package?

Thanks
Poly
Hi Paul,

The short answer is that the SDP would have ALL of the documents and information related to how the app was designed and developed including any policies or known compliance or other constraints. The purpose of the SDP is to provide a living set of knowledge assets that can be passed around the lifecycle for use in each stage (e.g., deployment, operations, support, updating, etc.)

The Professor

Popular posts from this blog

Four Service Characteristics

Recently I came across several articles by researchers and experts that laid out definitions and characteristics of services. ITIL provides us with a definition that can help drive the creation of value-laden services: A means of delivering value to customers by facilitating outcomes customers want to achieve without the ownership of specific costs and risks. An area that ITIL is not so clear is in terms of service characteristics. Several researchers and experts put forth that services have four basic characteristics (IHIP): Intangibility—Services are the results of actions not things. They have no physical presence and represent a logical set of elements. One way to think of service is “work done for others.”  Heterogeneity—Also known as “variability”; services are unique items because of the mechanisms used to deliver services, which is people. Because the people element adds variability, the service is variable. This holds true, especially for the value proposition—not eve...

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL 4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group.   As a service provider, we can’t stop there!   We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer.     Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include:     Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions 1. Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods.   Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service then toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you.   You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you.      ...

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

This article was originally published in 2015. With the Introduction of ITIL 4, some of this best practice has changed. See  ITIL 4 and the Evolving Role of Roles . Updated Definitions in ITIL 4: Process Owner: In ITIL 4, the concept of 'processes' has expanded into broader 'practices.' Consequently, the Process Owner is now often referred to as the 'Practice Owner.' This individual is accountable for the overall design, performance, integration, and improvement of a specific practice within the organization. They ensure that the practice achieves its intended outcomes and aligns with the organization's objectives. Process Manager: Now commonly known as the 'Practice Manager' in ITIL 4, this role is responsible for the day-to-day management of the practice. The Practice Manager ensures that activities are carried out as intended, manages resources assigned to the practice, and oversees the practitioners performing the work. Process Practit...