Service Measurement

Before my life as an ITSM professor, I was responsible for delivering the monthly reports on IT at a large specialty retailer organization with multiple remote locations in several states across America. I delivered many of the standard reports for Service Desk, Change Management and System Availability. System availability was a standard report that reviewed from a system / hardware perspective just how available the systems and their supporting components were throughout the month. This was delivered in percentages and the goal was to maintain 100% infrastructure availability.

Even though many of the individual systems and components were meeting their required SLAs, our customers were still not satisfied with the availability and performance of critical services. We needed to re-address what should we be measuring and how should we be reporting achievements back to the business and customers. We decided to report on the end to end delivery of our services and the actual customer experience from their perspective.

Three basic measurements were utilized

Availability of the service
Reliability of the service
Performance of the service

It was still valuable for us to also continue measuring these aspects for the underlying components. The individual metrics would be used as input into our new Service Availability Report. The key here was developing a service measurement framework that would from a statistical analysis model, coincide with what the customers were experiencing. Of course, this took some trial and error. As with any activity, we took a continual service improvement approach to refining what measurements and metrics we used to show all aspects of availability and unavailability of our services.

By re-evaluating our measurements with all stakeholders, we were able to establish an agreed definition of what success should look like. By choosing the correct measures, defining the critical elements, creating clear and relevant objectives and having define roles and responsibilities, we were able to successfully and accurately report the true customer experience and deliver a more sustainable and relevant level of service to our customers.

Comments

Unknown said…

Are there any details you can provide about how you approached calculating these measures? This is a challenging area!

September 20, 2012 at 7:39 PM

Four Service Characteristics

Recently I came across several articles by researchers and experts that laid out definitions and characteristics of services. ITIL provides us with a definition that can help drive the creation of value-laden services: A means of delivering value to customers by facilitating outcomes customers want to achieve without the ownership of specific costs and risks. An area that ITIL is not so clear is in terms of service characteristics. Several researchers and experts put forth that services have four basic characteristics (IHIP): Intangibility—Services are the results of actions not things. They have no physical presence and represent a logical set of elements. One way to think of service is “work done for others.” Heterogeneity—Also known as “variability”; services are unique items because of the mechanisms used to deliver services, which is people. Because the people element adds variability, the service is variable. This holds true, especially for the value proposition—not eve...

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL 4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group. As a service provider, we can’t stop there! We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer. Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include: Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions 1. Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods. Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service then toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you. You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you. ...

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

This article was originally published in 2015. With the Introduction of ITIL 4, some of this best practice has changed. See ITIL 4 and the Evolving Role of Roles . Updated Definitions in ITIL 4: Process Owner: In ITIL 4, the concept of 'processes' has expanded into broader 'practices.' Consequently, the Process Owner is now often referred to as the 'Practice Owner.' This individual is accountable for the overall design, performance, integration, and improvement of a specific practice within the organization. They ensure that the practice achieves its intended outcomes and aligns with the organization's objectives. Process Manager: Now commonly known as the 'Practice Manager' in ITIL 4, this role is responsible for the day-to-day management of the practice. The Practice Manager ensures that activities are carried out as intended, manages resources assigned to the practice, and oversees the practitioners performing the work. Process Practit...

Search