Skip to main content

Do LESS with LESS! Really??

Since the start of the millennium we have all heard that we must do “More with Less”.

I recently read an article where the idea of “Less for Less” was looked at from the perspective of if our resources are cut then we will have to cut programs, products, and services also.  Perhaps we should look at how to cut back on to whom and what we produce in order to stay within our means. Government sequestration may have triggered this way of thinking for some service providers. This is a catchy title but is this really the case?  Is there a different perspective on “Less for Less”?
Think back a few years when a downturn in the economy negatively impacted the workforce.  Families got creative.  The new trend became staycation instead of vacation.   A staycation meant less travel arrangements for less time in planning, less time on the road or in airports and therefore less missed connections, less cost for the family resulting in less stress and less debt!  What about VALUE!  Was there value in this?  Many did less for less and experienced real joy with lifelong memories! 
When we consider the increase for demand of new or changed services from customers it is difficult to imagine how service providers can produce value with the concept of “Less”.  The business demand is for MORE.  
Some things IT staff and service provider executives would all like to see less of!
In a recent discussion with ITSM practitioners is was noted that “Every time there is a release we have a barrage of meetings sucking up a lot of time and resources to resolve it!  I am sick of meetings. We just get through one fiasco and another is brewing!  “We keep doing the same thing over and over and expect a different result next time.”
These 60 and 80 hour workweeks are killing us!  What is work life balance again?
Dedicated people who are working hard do not want to feel that they are not enabled for success, it must be the infamous “THEY” who are at fault! 
What would you like to see less of?  Add your list here!...
What could you do less of that would result in less of what’s on your list?  
 “Less resistance” could prove to be for service providers what staycations were to families who adapted to “less for less” and created some of their most memorable times together.  For example: Less resistance to governance and process control might produce less chaos resulting in less time and meetings less frustration and less fires. Oh, did I mention less work, less effort and less stress?  Perhaps a little less resistance to invoking best practice for proactive planning process into service design could result in less resources, cost overruns and lost revenue due to unsatisfied customers.

Optimizing value for service providers and their consumers might just be doable by thinking about “LESS for LESS” and how LESS could result in true VALUE for all involved.   Do LESS with LESS!  Really!!


Dutch said…
Interesting article, but not so much about "Less" as well as increasing performance, by increasing the effectiveness of our actions, by decreasing the effects of the negative elements in our environment. For every example provided I can see what needs to be done "more" in order to mitigate the issue. One doesn't really create more value by doing less, instead I'd like to refer back to the mantra: "Work smarter, not harder".
Unknown said…
Great Perspective. Ties in with "Less" work in progress and "More" productivity! Like!

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

I was recently asked to clarify the roles of the Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner and wanted to share this with you. Roles and Responsibilities: Process Owner – this individual is “Accountable” for the process. They are the goto person and represent this process across the entire organization. They will ensure that the process is clearly defined, designed and documented. They will ensure that the process has a set of Policies for governance. Example: The process owner for Incident management will ensure that all of the activities to Identify, Record, Categorize, Investigate, … all the way to closing the incident are defined and documented with clearly defined roles, responsibilities, handoffs, and deliverables.  An example of a policy in could be… “All Incidents must be logged”. Policies are rules that govern the process. Process Owner ensures that all Process activities, (what to do), Procedures (details on how to perform the activity) and th

The ITIL® Maturity Model

Most organizations, especially service management organizations, strive to improve themselves. For those of us leveraging the ITIL® best practices, continual improvement is part of our DNA. We are constantly evaluating our organizations and looking for ways to improve. To aid in our improvement goals and underscore one of the major components of the ITIL Service Value System , Continual Improvement .   AXELOS has updated the ITIL Maturity Model and is offering new ITIL Assessment services. This will enable organizations to conduct evaluations and establish baselines to facilitate a continual improvement program. A while back I wrote an article on the importance of conducting an assessment . I explained the need to understand where you are before you can achieve your improvement goals. Understanding where you are deficient, how significant gaps are from your maturity objectives, and prioritizing which areas to focus on first are key to successfully improving. One method many organi

The Four Ps of Service Design - It’s not all about Technology

People ask me why I think that many designs and projects often fail. The most common answer is from a lack of preparation and management. Many IT organizations just think about the technology (product) implementation and fail to understand the risks of not planning for the effective and efficient use of the four Ps: People, Process, Products (services, technology and tools) and Partners (suppliers, manufacturers and vendors). A holistic approach should be adopted for all Service Design aspects and areas to ensure consistency and integration within all activities and processes across the entire IT environment, providing end to end business-related functionality and quality. (SD 2.4.2) People:   Have to have proper skills and possess the necessary competencies in order to get involved in the provision of IT services. The right skills, the right knowledge, the right level of experience must be kept current and aligned to the business needs. Products:   These are the technology managem