Business Value of Service Level Management

There have been many discussions on what is a Service Level Agreement (SLA) or what is an Operational Level Agreement (OLA). And by the way how does that differ from an Underpinning Contract? We can agonize over how to measure and what to measure and who, what, where, and how we should manage our internal and external reviews. Capturing the appropriate knowledge and building in a system for iterative activities and improvement are always a challenge. Each of these could provoke a lengthy discussion on their own merit. In this segment I would like to address the thought of who cares! In other words, what is the real business value for implementing Service Level Management (SLM)?

Why do I care about SLM?

At the root of it all, the true value of SLM is that it is a vital organ in the systemic approach to integrate the business with IT. Using SLM to strengthen the relationships between the two provide an opportunity for gleaning benefit from your effort. For many service providers SLM can mean survival for future.

In this competitive market service providers must be able to respond to questions such as:

· What services do you provide and how much is it costing you to provision them?

· Compared to competitor, what value for money can you provision?

· How much of your IT spend is spent on projects vs. operations or to keep the lights on?

If you are not able to answer these questions, you are not alone and not being able to do so may be a symptom. A symptom that you are not implementing SLM or perhaps that the scope and targets for existing SLAs are not appropriate to achieve the outcomes you had hoped for. Many SLAs are based on applications or targets that we internally create instead of on the service. Even if the service provider is meeting that SLA is there any evidence that they can quantify or demonstrate the value of services to their customer? How many business executives view IT as awesome or even competent? How many customers view IT as partners? It is very difficult for IT Service providers to demonstrate value to the business or their customers and Service Level Management when done correctly can help us to do that.

How to use SLM for Business Value

· Know your services and your customers

In order to demonstrate real value from SLM the focus must start with the customer and their view of the service. How can you be a “Service Provider” if you have not identified and documented your services or the service you provide your customer? How can you have an SLA if you cannot agree what the service is? The Service Level Manger must be enabled to work with the Business Relationship manager or account rep to keep a pulse on vital information, needs, and perspective of the customer. It is all about relationships!

· Create and measure services end-to-end to demonstrate real value to business and customers

Negotiate and Agree what your service is, quantify the service level requirements with the customer view in mind and ensure that the Service Level agreement is backed up with operational level agreements and underpinning contracts for the applications, servers, network and other components that support that service.

· Become an asset to the business and trusted advisor to the customer

When you are able to appropriately measure and demonstrate value, creditability increases. By sustaining the relationship through iterative SLM activities the service provider can raise the bar. When you can validate a decrease in costs that affect the bottom line and increases in customer satisfaction, the business value from SLM can make you the service provider of choice.

Four Service Characteristics

Recently I came across several articles by researchers and experts that laid out definitions and characteristics of services. ITIL provides us with a definition that can help drive the creation of value-laden services: A means of delivering value to customers by facilitating outcomes customers want to achieve without the ownership of specific costs and risks. An area that ITIL is not so clear is in terms of service characteristics. Several researchers and experts put forth that services have four basic characteristics (IHIP): Intangibility—Services are the results of actions not things. They have no physical presence and represent a logical set of elements. One way to think of service is “work done for others.” Heterogeneity—Also known as “variability”; services are unique items because of the mechanisms used to deliver services, which is people. Because the people element adds variability, the service is variable. This holds true, especially for the value proposition—not eve...

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL 4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group. As a service provider, we can’t stop there! We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer. Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include: Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions 1. Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods. Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service then toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you. You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you. ...

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

This article was originally published in 2015. With the Introduction of ITIL 4, some of this best practice has changed. See ITIL 4 and the Evolving Role of Roles . Updated Definitions in ITIL 4: Process Owner: In ITIL 4, the concept of 'processes' has expanded into broader 'practices.' Consequently, the Process Owner is now often referred to as the 'Practice Owner.' This individual is accountable for the overall design, performance, integration, and improvement of a specific practice within the organization. They ensure that the practice achieves its intended outcomes and aligns with the organization's objectives. Process Manager: Now commonly known as the 'Practice Manager' in ITIL 4, this role is responsible for the day-to-day management of the practice. The Practice Manager ensures that activities are carried out as intended, manages resources assigned to the practice, and oversees the practitioners performing the work. Process Practit...

Search