Skip to main content

WTF? Why the Failure?


Through the implementation of best practices, one of ITSM's critical success factors is to enhance the business' perception of the IT organization.  By creating a service strategy which helps to define good design, encourage effective transition processes and deliver valuable services through efficient and effective operational management, we work hard at making this goal a reality. Unfortunately, IT is often perceived to be ineffective and inefficient. 
Recently, the government’s inability to deliver a working website for the affordable care act was splashed all over  news with many of my non-IT friends and family asking, how could this happen?  How come IT people never get it right?
I want to respond with “BUT WE DO” and list many of the successes that I have been part of during my career.   But I look at them sheepishly and respond with” I don’t really know”.  As I think about this, I begin to get angry and not just because I’m an American tax payer, but because as an IT professional, I know the kinds of tools that we as an industry have at our disposal to ensure that these kinds of failures should never happen. Given the development of integrated tool sets, best practice frameworks, auditable standards and the focus on continual improvement it is inconceivable that a professional organization could deliver a product of such poor quality? Unfortunately, it happens and more often than we want to admit. 
The thing that is most disturbing for me is that ringing in my ears of “How come you IT people never get it right?”  It seems we have a lot more work in front of us, to enhance the public’s perception of our industry.  Perception is often reality and a successful service management program has to recognize and address internal and external perceptions of IT's ability and performance.   It's not easy but is quite possible when the message is one of learning from past successes and failures as part of your continual improvement.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

I was recently asked to clarify the roles of the Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner and wanted to share this with you. Roles and Responsibilities: Process Owner – this individual is “Accountable” for the process. They are the goto person and represent this process across the entire organization. They will ensure that the process is clearly defined, designed and documented. They will ensure that the process has a set of Policies for governance. Example: The process owner for Incident management will ensure that all of the activities to Identify, Record, Categorize, Investigate, … all the way to closing the incident are defined and documented with clearly defined roles, responsibilities, handoffs, and deliverables.  An example of a policy in could be… “All Incidents must be logged”. Policies are rules that govern the process. Process Owner ensures that all Process activities, (what to do), Procedures (details on how to perform the activity) and th

The ITIL® Maturity Model

Most organizations, especially service management organizations, strive to improve themselves. For those of us leveraging the ITIL® best practices, continual improvement is part of our DNA. We are constantly evaluating our organizations and looking for ways to improve. To aid in our improvement goals and underscore one of the major components of the ITIL Service Value System , Continual Improvement .   AXELOS has updated the ITIL Maturity Model and is offering new ITIL Assessment services. This will enable organizations to conduct evaluations and establish baselines to facilitate a continual improvement program. A while back I wrote an article on the importance of conducting an assessment . I explained the need to understand where you are before you can achieve your improvement goals. Understanding where you are deficient, how significant gaps are from your maturity objectives, and prioritizing which areas to focus on first are key to successfully improving. One method many organi

The Four Ps of Service Design - It’s not all about Technology

People ask me why I think that many designs and projects often fail. The most common answer is from a lack of preparation and management. Many IT organizations just think about the technology (product) implementation and fail to understand the risks of not planning for the effective and efficient use of the four Ps: People, Process, Products (services, technology and tools) and Partners (suppliers, manufacturers and vendors). A holistic approach should be adopted for all Service Design aspects and areas to ensure consistency and integration within all activities and processes across the entire IT environment, providing end to end business-related functionality and quality. (SD 2.4.2) People:   Have to have proper skills and possess the necessary competencies in order to get involved in the provision of IT services. The right skills, the right knowledge, the right level of experience must be kept current and aligned to the business needs. Products:   These are the technology managem