Minimum Viable IT Service Management (MVITSM)

The aim of Minimum Viable IT Service Management (MVITSM) is to put in place “just enough” process to meet your organizations, needs, goals and circumstances.

Minimum Viable Product
To understand this concept let’s take a look at some of the origins. The term Minimum Viable Product (MVP) originated in software development. If we research the definition we find that in product development, the MVP is a product which has just enough features to gather validated learning about the product and its continued development. Gathering insights from an MVP is often less expensive than using a product with more features which increase costs and risk in the case where the product fails, for example, due to incorrect assumptions.

Minimum Viable Process
In a recent workshop Donna Knapp from ITSM Academy indicated that the Minimum Viable Process is really a matter of looking at what are the minimum critical activities that need to be performed in a process. Complex bureaucratic processes tend to become rigid and rarely get scaled back. To ensure outcomes we really need to start with the most basic form of a process and if the process is already in place then look to scale back to only those minimum critical activities.

Minimum Critical Activities
The following are some characteristics that could help identify what your critical activities should be.

Critical Activities will:

Represent activities that must be performed to provide evidence of compliance

(Legal and regulatory controls / standards)

Define “what to do” not “how to do it”
Are not based on a single framework
Provide a starting place to assess current practices

Red – not performing
Yellow – Performing / Needs improvement
Green – Performing Successfully

It helps to bring transparency to work in progress, cycle time and completed work. Exposure of waste is the first step to eliminate it and to produce quality service at the speed and cost that is relevant to today’s standards. New ways of speaking and acting will lead to new behaviors. As we start moving into a more nibble system for service management we understand that we need to bring ”Agile” and “Lean” values to our process design or redesign activities. As the process and the behavior shifts your culture will change. Why? Bigger, Better, More …. Faster than ever before at the least amount of cost!

Learn More about DevOps and Agile Service Management.

Comments

Four Service Characteristics

Recently I came across several articles by researchers and experts that laid out definitions and characteristics of services. ITIL provides us with a definition that can help drive the creation of value-laden services: A means of delivering value to customers by facilitating outcomes customers want to achieve without the ownership of specific costs and risks. An area that ITIL is not so clear is in terms of service characteristics. Several researchers and experts put forth that services have four basic characteristics (IHIP): Intangibility—Services are the results of actions not things. They have no physical presence and represent a logical set of elements. One way to think of service is “work done for others.” Heterogeneity—Also known as “variability”; services are unique items because of the mechanisms used to deliver services, which is people. Because the people element adds variability, the service is variable. This holds true, especially for the value proposition—not eve...

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL 4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group. As a service provider, we can’t stop there! We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer. Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include: Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions 1. Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods. Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service then toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you. You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you. ...

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

This article was originally published in 2015. With the Introduction of ITIL 4, some of this best practice has changed. See ITIL 4 and the Evolving Role of Roles . Updated Definitions in ITIL 4: Process Owner: In ITIL 4, the concept of 'processes' has expanded into broader 'practices.' Consequently, the Process Owner is now often referred to as the 'Practice Owner.' This individual is accountable for the overall design, performance, integration, and improvement of a specific practice within the organization. They ensure that the practice achieves its intended outcomes and aligns with the organization's objectives. Process Manager: Now commonly known as the 'Practice Manager' in ITIL 4, this role is responsible for the day-to-day management of the practice. The Practice Manager ensures that activities are carried out as intended, manages resources assigned to the practice, and oversees the practitioners performing the work. Process Practit...

Search