Skip to main content

Incidents and Defects: What’s the Right Approach in ITIL 4?

When an incident is caused by a defect, how should IT teams respond? It’s a question we’ve been answering for years, and it’s still just as relevant, especially in today’s complex, fast-moving environments where software, infrastructure, and services are deeply interconnected.

In ITIL 4, an incident is defined as an unplanned interruption to a service or reduction in the quality of

a service. That hasn’t changed. But what happens when the root cause of that interruption is a defect - an underlying flaw in software, hardware, or configuration?

Here's the Modern Approach:

  • Log the incident: The user is experiencing an interruption that needs immediate attention.
  • Document known defect links: If the defect is known (e.g., “already logged with Dev”), link the incident to the problem record, known error, or defect backlog in your tracking system (Jira, Azure DevOps, etc.).
  • Communicate expectations: While the defect may not have a quick fix, the incident response should still manage user experience. Be transparent: “We’re aware of the root cause, and we’re tracking this with our development team.”
  • Prioritize based on impact: If the defect affects a large group or a critical service, it may warrant escalation, even if a workaround exists.

ITIL 4 Encourages Collaboration

ITIL 4 emphasizes breaking down silos. When incidents are caused by defects, cross-functional collaboration between the Service Desk, IT Operations, and Development becomes crucial.

This aligns with DevOps principles and Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) practices, where shared ownership of quality and service uptime is the norm. It's no longer about tossing the issue "over the wall", it's about resolving the user impact together.

What About Problems and Known Errors?

When defects are recurring or not immediately resolvable, they should be logged as problems. Once diagnosed and documented, they become known errors, ideally with a workaround. This linkage improves future incident resolution and enables more proactive service management.

Final Thoughts

Yes, it's still an incident...even when it's a defect. But how we manage that incident has evolved.

ITIL 4 teaches us to stay user-focused, data-driven, and collaborative across teams. With the right workflows and communication in place, even a defect-driven incident becomes an opportunity to improve trust, transparency, and service experience.

Need help mapping ITIL 4 practices to your organization’s workflows? Visit itsmacademy.com to connect with our experts.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Four Service Characteristics

Recently I came across several articles by researchers and experts that laid out definitions and characteristics of services. ITIL provides us with a definition that can help drive the creation of value-laden services: A means of delivering value to customers by facilitating outcomes customers want to achieve without the ownership of specific costs and risks. An area that ITIL is not so clear is in terms of service characteristics. Several researchers and experts put forth that services have four basic characteristics (IHIP): Intangibility—Services are the results of actions not things. They have no physical presence and represent a logical set of elements. One way to think of service is “work done for others.”  Heterogeneity—Also known as “variability”; services are unique items because of the mechanisms used to deliver services, which is people. Because the people element adds variability, the service is variable. This holds true, especially for the value proposition—not eve...

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

This article was originally published in 2015. With the Introduction of ITIL 4, some of this best practice has changed. See  ITIL 4 and the Evolving Role of Roles . Updated Definitions in ITIL 4: Process Owner: In ITIL 4, the concept of 'processes' has expanded into broader 'practices.' Consequently, the Process Owner is now often referred to as the 'Practice Owner.' This individual is accountable for the overall design, performance, integration, and improvement of a specific practice within the organization. They ensure that the practice achieves its intended outcomes and aligns with the organization's objectives. Process Manager: Now commonly known as the 'Practice Manager' in ITIL 4, this role is responsible for the day-to-day management of the practice. The Practice Manager ensures that activities are carried out as intended, manages resources assigned to the practice, and oversees the practitioners performing the work. Process Practit...

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL 4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group.   As a service provider, we can’t stop there!   We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer.     Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include:     Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions 1. Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods.   Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service then toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you.   You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you.      ...