What We’ve Seen Go Wrong (After the Class Ends)

After two decades of delivering ITSM training, we’ve had a front-row seat to what happens after the exam is over.

And here’s the truth that many providers don’t talk about: passing the exam is not the hard part.

What goes wrong usually happens when learners return to work, and good intentions collide with real organizations, real constraints, and real habits.

Here are the most common patterns we’ve seen.

1. The credential becomes the finish line

Too often, certification is treated as the outcome instead of a milestone. Learners celebrate (as they should), but there’s no next step defined for application. No time carved out to try something new. No expectation that behavior will change.

Without intent, learning quietly fades back into routine.

2. “We took the class.” replaces “We changed how we work.”

Organizations sometimes check the training box without addressing the environment learners return to. The tools stay the same. The incentives stay the same. Leadership language doesn’t change.

When learners feel they’re expected to work exactly as before, even the best ideas stall.

What we do differently: the Personal Action Plan

To prevent “great class, now what?” we embed our Personal Action Plan into every course delivery. It’s a simple, structured way for learners to translate concepts into real work - immediately.

Turns learning into next steps: learners identify 1-3 concrete actions they can apply in their current role, not “someday.”
Builds accountability: learners define who they’ll share the plan with, what support they need, and when they’ll review progress.
Creates momentum through small experiments: learners pick low-risk changes they can test, measure, and iterate - so training becomes behavior change.
Helps leaders reinforce application: we include guidance for managers on how to sponsor follow-through and remove barriers back on the job.

Net effect: learners leave with a plan, a timeline, and a practical bridge from classroom to workplace - so the value of training doesn’t evaporate after the exam.

3. Too much theory, not enough translation

Frameworks are powerful, but only when people know how to translate them into their context.

When learners leave with concepts but no bridge to their services, their customers, and their constraints, they struggle to apply what they learned with confidence.

4. No shared language across the team

Training individuals without aligning teams creates friction. One person comes back excited, using new language, while everyone else is still operating from an older mental model.

Instead of momentum, you get confusion, or worse, quiet resistance.

5. Learning without reflection

The biggest missed opportunity is not pausing to ask: What should we stop doing now that we know this?

Without reflection, learning adds noise instead of clarity.

We’ve learned that training succeeds not because of what’s covered, but because of what learners are supported to do next.

Which leads to the flip side of this story - What Actually Sticks After Class (And Why)

Four Service Characteristics

Recently I came across several articles by researchers and experts that laid out definitions and characteristics of services. ITIL provides us with a definition that can help drive the creation of value-laden services: A means of delivering value to customers by facilitating outcomes customers want to achieve without the ownership of specific costs and risks. An area that ITIL is not so clear is in terms of service characteristics. Several researchers and experts put forth that services have four basic characteristics (IHIP): Intangibility—Services are the results of actions not things. They have no physical presence and represent a logical set of elements. One way to think of service is “work done for others.” Heterogeneity—Also known as “variability”; services are unique items because of the mechanisms used to deliver services, which is people. Because the people element adds variability, the service is variable. This holds true, especially for the value proposition—not eve...

The New Four Ps of Service Management

By Donna Knapp For years, people , process , and technology (PPT) was a widely recognized framework for balancing and integrating the components needed to achieve optimal performance and outcomes. In the ITIL v3 Service Design publication, this framework was expanded to the four Ps: people , processes , products , and partners . ITIL 4 has further expanded and evolved this framework to the four dimensions of service management. These four dimensions are collectively critical to the effective and efficient facilitation of value for customers and other stakeholders in the form of products and services. The four dimensions of service management are: Organizations and people Information and technology Partners and suppliers Value streams and processes. These four dimensions represent perspectives which are relevant to the whole service value system (SVS), including the entirety of the service value chain and all ITIL practices. Each ITIL practice is a set of organizational resources base...

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL 4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group. As a service provider, we can’t stop there! We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer. Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include: Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions 1. Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods. Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service then toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you. You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you. ...

Search