What We’ve Seen Go Wrong (After the Class Ends)

After two decades of delivering ITSM training, we’ve had a front-row seat to what happens after the exam is over.

And here’s the truth that many providers don’t talk about: passing the exam is not the hard part.

What goes wrong usually happens when learners return to work, and good intentions collide with real organizations, real constraints, and real habits.

Here are the most common patterns we’ve seen.

1. The credential becomes the finish line

Too often, certification is treated as the outcome instead of a milestone. Learners celebrate (as they should), but there’s no next step defined for application. No time carved out to try something new. No expectation that behavior will change.

Without intent, learning quietly fades back into routine.

2. “We took the class.” replaces “We changed how we work.”

Organizations sometimes check the training box without addressing the environment learners return to. The tools stay the same. The incentives stay the same. Leadership language doesn’t change.

When learners feel they’re expected to work exactly as before, even the best ideas stall.

What we do differently: the Personal Action Plan

To prevent “great class, now what?” we embed our Personal Action Plan into every course delivery. It’s a simple, structured way for learners to translate concepts into real work - immediately.

Turns learning into next steps: learners identify 1-3 concrete actions they can apply in their current role, not “someday.”
Builds accountability: learners define who they’ll share the plan with, what support they need, and when they’ll review progress.
Creates momentum through small experiments: learners pick low-risk changes they can test, measure, and iterate - so training becomes behavior change.
Helps leaders reinforce application: we include guidance for managers on how to sponsor follow-through and remove barriers back on the job.

Net effect: learners leave with a plan, a timeline, and a practical bridge from classroom to workplace - so the value of training doesn’t evaporate after the exam.

3. Too much theory, not enough translation

Frameworks are powerful, but only when people know how to translate them into their context.

When learners leave with concepts but no bridge to their services, their customers, and their constraints, they struggle to apply what they learned with confidence.

4. No shared language across the team

Training individuals without aligning teams creates friction. One person comes back excited, using new language, while everyone else is still operating from an older mental model.

Instead of momentum, you get confusion, or worse, quiet resistance.

5. Learning without reflection

The biggest missed opportunity is not pausing to ask: What should we stop doing now that we know this?

Without reflection, learning adds noise instead of clarity.

We’ve learned that training succeeds not because of what’s covered, but because of what learners are supported to do next.

Which leads to the flip side of this story - What Actually Sticks After Class (And Why)

Four Service Characteristics

Recently I came across several articles by researchers and experts that laid out definitions and characteristics of services. ITIL provides us with a definition that can help drive the creation of value-laden services: A means of delivering value to customers by facilitating outcomes customers want to achieve without the ownership of specific costs and risks. An area that ITIL is not so clear is in terms of service characteristics. Several researchers and experts put forth that services have four basic characteristics (IHIP): Intangibility—Services are the results of actions not things. They have no physical presence and represent a logical set of elements. One way to think of service is “work done for others.” Heterogeneity—Also known as “variability”; services are unique items because of the mechanisms used to deliver services, which is people. Because the people element adds variability, the service is variable. This holds true, especially for the value proposition—not eve...

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL 4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group. As a service provider, we can’t stop there! We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer. Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include: Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions 1. Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods. Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service then toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you. You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you. ...

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

This article was originally published in 2015. With the Introduction of ITIL 4, some of the concepts have changed in ways that are described below. ITIL 4 has also introduced new roles, as explained in our blog ITIL 4 and the Evolving Role of Roles . Before we dive into the difference between these roles, let’s first look at a key update in ITIL 4 – the shift from processes to practices. ITIL 4 has evolved to focus on holistic practices vs. isolated processes. By definition, a practice is a set of organizational resources designed for performing work or accomplishing an objective. For example, the purpose of the incident management practice is to minimize the negative impact of incidents by restoring normal service operation as quickly as possible. All organizations recognize the need to allocate resources to the management of incidents and mature their capabilities in that area. In ITIL 4, each practice includes resources based on the four ...

Search