Conducting an Internal ITSM Asssessment

One of my followers recently asked about approaches to performing an organizational ITSM assessment. I’ve summarized some of his questions:

1. While surveys, interviews and workshops are assessment methods, would focused interviews with individuals pertinent to the process being assessed be a good approach?

2. Should my final assessment score for a process be an average of several people’s maturity level ratings on that process?

3. Should my assessment only include participants who are directly involved with that process?

Assessments should take a well-rounded approach to gathering information, input and feedback. It’s not a one-size-fits-all. If you have the ability to conduct one-on-one interviews with key stakeholders, that’s a great way to encourage dialogue through open-ended questions. While the results may not be as measurable as some other assessment techniques, interviews provide the unique opportunity for deeper probing and follow-up. Surveys and workshops also have a place in assessment – they are excellent vehicles for getting input from large and diverse groups of stakeholders. Like any good recipe, an ITSM assessment should include different ingredients.

A well-rounded approach should also include engaging a large cross-section of stakeholders from the business and IT. Each will touch the process in a different way – some may execute or contribute to process activities, some may be recipients or customers of the process, others may be observers of the process results. The more perspective that you can garner during the assessment, the better.

As for scoring, I would suggest that the narrative is more important than the number. Appendix H of the Service Design publication explains ITIL’s Process Maturity Framework. While the levels are numeric, the descriptors are not assigned a value. This approach encourages the assessor to focus more on what’s happening with the process and less on what score to assign. Process maturity is not an exact science, but it can be an invaluable asset when performing an ITSM assessment.

Comments

Four Service Characteristics

Recently I came across several articles by researchers and experts that laid out definitions and characteristics of services. ITIL provides us with a definition that can help drive the creation of value-laden services: A means of delivering value to customers by facilitating outcomes customers want to achieve without the ownership of specific costs and risks. An area that ITIL is not so clear is in terms of service characteristics. Several researchers and experts put forth that services have four basic characteristics (IHIP): Intangibility—Services are the results of actions not things. They have no physical presence and represent a logical set of elements. One way to think of service is “work done for others.” Heterogeneity—Also known as “variability”; services are unique items because of the mechanisms used to deliver services, which is people. Because the people element adds variability, the service is variable. This holds true, especially for the value proposition—not eve...

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL 4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group. As a service provider, we can’t stop there! We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer. Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include: Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions 1. Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods. Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service then toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you. You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you. ...

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

This article was originally published in 2015. With the Introduction of ITIL 4, some of this best practice has changed. See ITIL 4 and the Evolving Role of Roles . Updated Definitions in ITIL 4: Process Owner: In ITIL 4, the concept of 'processes' has expanded into broader 'practices.' Consequently, the Process Owner is now often referred to as the 'Practice Owner.' This individual is accountable for the overall design, performance, integration, and improvement of a specific practice within the organization. They ensure that the practice achieves its intended outcomes and aligns with the organization's objectives. Process Manager: Now commonly known as the 'Practice Manager' in ITIL 4, this role is responsible for the day-to-day management of the practice. The Practice Manager ensures that activities are carried out as intended, manages resources assigned to the practice, and oversees the practitioners performing the work. Process Practit...

Search