Skip to main content

Process Maturity – How can I Assess it?

A process is doomed if you ever consider it done!  Unlike an audit that examines evidence to determine compliance, a process assessment is conducted to evaluate and organizations strengths and weaknesses.  The assessor will ensure that this baseline is utilized to identify process improvement opportunities that ensure business outcomes.

The ITIL Process Maturity Framework (PMF) was defined specifically for ITSM processes and consists of five levels of maturity.

·         Level One – Initial
At this level there is not a defined process, there are some procedures and few results are retained.
·         Level Two – Repeatable
At this level of maturity there is a recognized process but the objectives are not clear and targets are not formalized.
·         Level Three – Defined
It is at this level of maturity that the process is defined and documented and there are agreed upon targets.
·         Level Four – Managed
A managed process at this level is well defined, interfaces and integrates with other processes and objectives for measurement are based upon business goals.
·         Level Five – Optimized
Very few processes reach this level of maturity where the process in institutionalized within the organization, strategic goals are aligned with business goals and the process is optimized to dynamically improve as the demand and business needs shift.

These are brief descriptions for each level and in and of themselves do not ensure that your process has reached that level of maturity. In order to assess fully that your process has reached a specific level the assessor must utilize the checklist of characteristics or criteria to determine the true level of maturity within your organization.  Assessments are generally comprised of interviews with key stakeholders in the process including the customer, the practitioners, the business representatives and more to determine if the criteria in the assessment checklist is met for each level. 

This is a great book for information on designing and reengineering processes for IT Service Management and has a lot of information and guidance for ongoing process improvement.

If you are trying to establish your process maturity, information and sample reports along with additional frameworks such as CMMI and IPAF for performing self-assessments are offered via ITSMF International:

The assessor could be an internal staff member but caution is needed to ensure skillset, knowledge and objectivity.  You will have to agree the scope of -- process only -- people and process -- people, process and technology/tools -- or perhaps a comprehensive assessment including people, process, technology, culture and organizational structure is in order.  The time allocated to the project will be determined by the scope.

If you are interested in developing this skill set, training and certification for Certified Process Design Engineers can be found at:


Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

I was recently asked to clarify the roles of the Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner and wanted to share this with you. Roles and Responsibilities: Process Owner – this individual is “Accountable” for the process. They are the goto person and represent this process across the entire organization. They will ensure that the process is clearly defined, designed and documented. They will ensure that the process has a set of Policies for governance. Example: The process owner for Incident management will ensure that all of the activities to Identify, Record, Categorize, Investigate, … all the way to closing the incident are defined and documented with clearly defined roles, responsibilities, handoffs, and deliverables.  An example of a policy in could be… “All Incidents must be logged”. Policies are rules that govern the process. Process Owner ensures that all Process activities, (what to do), Procedures (details on how to perform the activity) and th

The Four Ps of Service Design - It’s not all about Technology

People ask me why I think that many designs and projects often fail. The most common answer is from a lack of preparation and management. Many IT organizations just think about the technology (product) implementation and fail to understand the risks of not planning for the effective and efficient use of the four Ps: People, Process, Products (services, technology and tools) and Partners (suppliers, manufacturers and vendors). A holistic approach should be adopted for all Service Design aspects and areas to ensure consistency and integration within all activities and processes across the entire IT environment, providing end to end business-related functionality and quality. (SD 2.4.2) People:   Have to have proper skills and possess the necessary competencies in order to get involved in the provision of IT services. The right skills, the right knowledge, the right level of experience must be kept current and aligned to the business needs. Products:   These are the technology managem

The ITIL® Maturity Model

Most organizations, especially service management organizations, strive to improve themselves. For those of us leveraging the ITIL® best practices, continual improvement is part of our DNA. We are constantly evaluating our organizations and looking for ways to improve. To aid in our improvement goals and underscore one of the major components of the ITIL Service Value System , Continual Improvement .   AXELOS has updated the ITIL Maturity Model and is offering new ITIL Assessment services. This will enable organizations to conduct evaluations and establish baselines to facilitate a continual improvement program. A while back I wrote an article on the importance of conducting an assessment . I explained the need to understand where you are before you can achieve your improvement goals. Understanding where you are deficient, how significant gaps are from your maturity objectives, and prioritizing which areas to focus on first are key to successfully improving. One method many organi