Skip to main content

Metrics and Business Value

IT managers gather and distribute metrics that reflect their group’s performance on a regular and timely basis.  But outside of their immediate organizations do these metrics have any real meaning or impact? Do these measurements really define the value that IT is delivering?  Business executives shouldn’t have to work to see the positive impact of IT performance.  It should be made readily visible, in language they can grasp quickly and easily.  In many IT organizations there is a continued focus of their reporting towards the performance of the technology and not the value being delivered to the business.  This emphasis continues to create a gap between IT and the rest of the organization. (1)

What metrics do you employ?  Service metrics, measuring the end to end performance of your services, based on your technology metrics.   Technology metrics, performance of your components and applications. Are they available when needed? Do you have the correct levels of capacity to meet dynamic demand?  What best practice processes do you engage and how are they measured?

Many of the organizations I have visited do these things, but stop short of having a strong overarching vision about what they want their technologies to accomplish and what the business value and benefit should be.  There is a lack of coordination among the many silos that make up the IT organization and what services should be rendered to their customers.  Many even operate without even giving much thought to “what value are we generating for our organizations. 

So I take us back to the “Continual Service Improvement” approach:

  • What is the vision?  Ensure business and IT strategic alignment.  An overarching vision of how our technology generates business value in measurable ways the business can understand.
  • Where are we now?  Do we have strong governance strategically, tactically and operationally to ensure are efforts are well coordinated across all of our silos?
  • Where do we want to be?  Have we identified areas where vision and alignment aren’t what they should be and defined plans and activities for improvement?
  • How do we get there?  Implementation of prioritized plans and activities to build strong digital skills and culture.
  • Did we get there?  Use of appropriate measures defined by both business and IT to validate our course of action and verify results of business outcomes.
  • How do we keep the momentum going?  Continued diligence in ensuring that our technology continues to generate business value.

                                                                   
1 The Real Business of IT – Richard Hunter, George Westerman

For more information on Continual Service Improvement training and certification go to http://www.itsmacademy.com/itil-csi/ 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Four Service Characteristics

Recently I came across several articles by researchers and experts that laid out definitions and characteristics of services. ITIL provides us with a definition that can help drive the creation of value-laden services: A means of delivering value to customers by facilitating outcomes customers want to achieve without the ownership of specific costs and risks. An area that ITIL is not so clear is in terms of service characteristics. Several researchers and experts put forth that services have four basic characteristics (IHIP): Intangibility—Services are the results of actions not things. They have no physical presence and represent a logical set of elements. One way to think of service is “work done for others.”  Heterogeneity—Also known as “variability”; services are unique items because of the mechanisms used to deliver services, which is people. Because the people element adds variability, the service is variable. This holds true, especially for the value proposition—not eve...

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL 4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group.   As a service provider, we can’t stop there!   We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer.     Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include:     Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions 1. Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods.   Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service then toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you.   You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you.      ...

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

This article was originally published in 2015. With the Introduction of ITIL 4, some of this best practice has changed. See  ITIL 4 and the Evolving Role of Roles . Updated Definitions in ITIL 4: Process Owner: In ITIL 4, the concept of 'processes' has expanded into broader 'practices.' Consequently, the Process Owner is now often referred to as the 'Practice Owner.' This individual is accountable for the overall design, performance, integration, and improvement of a specific practice within the organization. They ensure that the practice achieves its intended outcomes and aligns with the organization's objectives. Process Manager: Now commonly known as the 'Practice Manager' in ITIL 4, this role is responsible for the day-to-day management of the practice. The Practice Manager ensures that activities are carried out as intended, manages resources assigned to the practice, and oversees the practitioners performing the work. Process Practit...