Skip to main content

Metrics and Business Value

IT managers gather and distribute metrics that reflect their group’s performance on a regular and timely basis.  But outside of their immediate organizations do these metrics have any real meaning or impact? Do these measurements really define the value that IT is delivering?  Business executives shouldn’t have to work to see the positive impact of IT performance.  It should be made readily visible, in language they can grasp quickly and easily.  In many IT organizations there is a continued focus of their reporting towards the performance of the technology and not the value being delivered to the business.  This emphasis continues to create a gap between IT and the rest of the organization. (1)

What metrics do you employ?  Service metrics, measuring the end to end performance of your services, based on your technology metrics.   Technology metrics, performance of your components and applications. Are they available when needed? Do you have the correct levels of capacity to meet dynamic demand?  What best practice processes do you engage and how are they measured?

Many of the organizations I have visited do these things, but stop short of having a strong overarching vision about what they want their technologies to accomplish and what the business value and benefit should be.  There is a lack of coordination among the many silos that make up the IT organization and what services should be rendered to their customers.  Many even operate without even giving much thought to “what value are we generating for our organizations. 

So I take us back to the “Continual Service Improvement” approach:

  • What is the vision?  Ensure business and IT strategic alignment.  An overarching vision of how our technology generates business value in measurable ways the business can understand.
  • Where are we now?  Do we have strong governance strategically, tactically and operationally to ensure are efforts are well coordinated across all of our silos?
  • Where do we want to be?  Have we identified areas where vision and alignment aren’t what they should be and defined plans and activities for improvement?
  • How do we get there?  Implementation of prioritized plans and activities to build strong digital skills and culture.
  • Did we get there?  Use of appropriate measures defined by both business and IT to validate our course of action and verify results of business outcomes.
  • How do we keep the momentum going?  Continued diligence in ensuring that our technology continues to generate business value.

                                                                   
1 The Real Business of IT – Richard Hunter, George Westerman

For more information on Continual Service Improvement training and certification go to http://www.itsmacademy.com/itil-csi/ 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Four Ps of Service Design - It’s not all about Technology

People ask me why I think that many designs and projects often fail. The most common answer is from a lack of preparation and management. Many IT organizations just think about the technology (product) implementation and fail to understand the risks of not planning for the effective and efficient use of the four Ps: People, Process, Products (services, technology and tools) and Partners (suppliers, manufacturers and vendors). A holistic approach should be adopted for all Service Design aspects and areas to ensure consistency and integration within all activities and processes across the entire IT environment, providing end to end business-related functionality and quality. (SD 2.4.2) People:   Have to have proper skills and possess the necessary competencies in order to get involved in the provision of IT services. The right skills, the right knowledge, the right level of experience must be kept current and aligned to the business needs. Products:   These are the technology managem

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group .   As a service provider, we can’t stop there!   We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer.     Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include:     Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods.   Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service than toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you.   You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you.               Note: Goods may not always be provided for every Service

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

I was recently asked to clarify the roles of the Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner and wanted to share this with you. Roles and Responsibilities: Process Owner – this individual is “Accountable” for the process. They are the goto person and represent this process across the entire organization. They will ensure that the process is clearly defined, designed and documented. They will ensure that the process has a set of Policies for governance. Example: The process owner for Incident management will ensure that all of the activities to Identify, Record, Categorize, Investigate, … all the way to closing the incident are defined and documented with clearly defined roles, responsibilities, handoffs, and deliverables.  An example of a policy in could be… “All Incidents must be logged”. Policies are rules that govern the process. Process Owner ensures that all Process activities, (what to do), Procedures (details on how to perform the activity) and th