Skip to main content

The Best of the Professor: The Third Way

The “Best of the Professor” blogs focus on one unique individual topic and will be followed by links to papers with more in depth information.

DevOps initiatives are supported by three basic principles. In his book “The Phoenix Project“, Gene Kim leverages the Theory of Constraints and the knowledge learned in production environments to describe the underlying principles of the DevOps movement in three ways. These principals are referred to as The First Way, The Second Way and the Third Way.   In earlier papers from the “Best of the Professor” we discussed  the “First Way” and how this DevOps principle was all about the flow of work from Left to Right.  We then discussed the “Second Way which was all about the flow of work from right to left and how critical that is for measuring DevOps value.  In this iteration from “The Best of the Professor“, the focus will be on the last of these three DevOps Principles known as “The Third Way”.

The Third Way – Continual Experimentation and Learning (Don’t forget the learning part)

The goal of this DevOps principle known as “The Third Way” is to create a culture that fosters two things.  One of those being continual experimentation such as taking risks and learning from failure and the second thing is to understand that repetition is the prerequisite to mastery.

Every service provider really needs both aspects of “The Third Way” equally. Experimentation and taking risks are what ensures that we keep pushing to improve even if it means going deeper into the danger zone than we have ever gone before.  We also need mastery of the skills that can help us retreat out of that danger zone when we’ve gone too far.  Companies that really want to show their commitment to innovation, and fearlessness when it comes to failure, cannot punish people who fail.  In order to ensure “Continual Experimentation and Learning” will require that we allocate time for the improvement of daily work.  It will also mean that we should create rituals that reward the team for taking risks and perhaps that we introduce faults into the system to increase resilience.  Be sure to read up on all 3 of the DevOps Principles to ensure optimum results.  They really do work.

For further information from the professor on DevOps Principles:


For information regarding Agile and DevOps training and certification: http://www.itsmacademy.com/brands/DevOps.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Four Ps of Service Design - It’s not all about Technology

People ask me why I think that many designs and projects often fail. The most common answer is from a lack of preparation and management. Many IT organizations just think about the technology (product) implementation and fail to understand the risks of not planning for the effective and efficient use of the four Ps: People, Process, Products (services, technology and tools) and Partners (suppliers, manufacturers and vendors). A holistic approach should be adopted for all Service Design aspects and areas to ensure consistency and integration within all activities and processes across the entire IT environment, providing end to end business-related functionality and quality. (SD 2.4.2) People:   Have to have proper skills and possess the necessary competencies in order to get involved in the provision of IT services. The right skills, the right knowledge, the right level of experience must be kept current and aligned to the business needs. Products:   These are the technology managem

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group .   As a service provider, we can’t stop there!   We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer.     Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include:     Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods.   Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service than toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you.   You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you.               Note: Goods may not always be provided for every Service

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

I was recently asked to clarify the roles of the Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner and wanted to share this with you. Roles and Responsibilities: Process Owner – this individual is “Accountable” for the process. They are the goto person and represent this process across the entire organization. They will ensure that the process is clearly defined, designed and documented. They will ensure that the process has a set of Policies for governance. Example: The process owner for Incident management will ensure that all of the activities to Identify, Record, Categorize, Investigate, … all the way to closing the incident are defined and documented with clearly defined roles, responsibilities, handoffs, and deliverables.  An example of a policy in could be… “All Incidents must be logged”. Policies are rules that govern the process. Process Owner ensures that all Process activities, (what to do), Procedures (details on how to perform the activity) and th