Agile Process … What?! Is That an Oxymoron?

To survive in today’s competitive business climate organization’s must respond quickly to their customers’ evolving needs and desires. How many times have you heard that? We know from experience that an agile culture where agility is gained through people, process and tools can enable organizations to gain market share and competitive advantage. And still, more organizations than not silo agile principles to software and product development. Ever wonder why, as an industry, we are not getting the types of returns that are expected from our efforts?

Agile software development alone will not get us there! Other factors include:

Ability to quickly respond to customer feedback and needs – Customer engagement.
An understanding that the customer and business requirements are dynamic and that we must have agile processes in place to respond to them. (Not only agile development)
Sustained innovation and speed from idea to end of life for the service and processes.
Increased employee engagement, creativity and profitability and talent retention. This could include the support of DevOps, Agile Service Management and Agile Process Owner training and education.
New behaviors that are encouraged through experimentation and learning in Development, in Test, in Release and most importantly in Service Operation.
Making smaller incremental changes to processes as well as services.
A keen pulse on the cadence of demand and having processes in place to meet it.
Agile Process Owners that are skilled enough to ensure incremental improvements that keep service management lean and adaptive.

Agile Service Management throughout the value stream is the only way that organizations will truly be able to achieve the level of agility and value that is required. In order to obtain this, we must educate and inspire staff, managers and process owners. Without agile processes that support the activities it will be difficult to streamline and also very difficult to automate. What if we were to have agile software development and then at the same time have overburdened, bureaucratic, change management and other ITSM processes? What could we gain? More importantly, how much is that costing?

A process owner is the individual accountable for the performance of a process and for ensuring the process delivers value to its stakeholders. Process owners manage the requirements of process stakeholders, translate those requirements into process performance objectives and oversee the entire process design and improvement lifecycle. We need agile people and must have agile processes to support customer and business dynamic requirements.

It is becoming more apparent every day that we simply cannot silo “Agility”. Having “Agile Process” is not an oxymoron. In many cases Agile Service Management with agile process is the missing element in our formula for success.

To learn more about Agile Service Management or to obtain Certified Agile Process Owner information and certification: http://www.itsmacademy.com/Agile

Four Service Characteristics

Recently I came across several articles by researchers and experts that laid out definitions and characteristics of services. ITIL provides us with a definition that can help drive the creation of value-laden services: A means of delivering value to customers by facilitating outcomes customers want to achieve without the ownership of specific costs and risks. An area that ITIL is not so clear is in terms of service characteristics. Several researchers and experts put forth that services have four basic characteristics (IHIP): Intangibility—Services are the results of actions not things. They have no physical presence and represent a logical set of elements. One way to think of service is “work done for others.” Heterogeneity—Also known as “variability”; services are unique items because of the mechanisms used to deliver services, which is people. Because the people element adds variability, the service is variable. This holds true, especially for the value proposition—not eve...

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

This article was originally published in 2015. With the Introduction of ITIL 4, some of the concepts have changed in ways that are described below. ITIL 4 has also introduced new roles, as explained in our blog ITIL 4 and the Evolving Role of Roles . Before we dive into the difference between these roles, let’s first look at a key update in ITIL 4 – the shift from processes to practices. ITIL 4 has evolved to focus on holistic practices vs. isolated processes. By definition, a practice is a set of organizational resources designed for performing work or accomplishing an objective. For example, the purpose of the incident management practice is to minimize the negative impact of incidents by restoring normal service operation as quickly as possible. All organizations recognize the need to allocate resources to the management of incidents and mature their capabilities in that area. In ITIL 4, each practice includes resources based on the four ...

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL 4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group. As a service provider, we can’t stop there! We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer. Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include: Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions 1. Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods. Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service then toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you. You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you. ...

Search