Skip to main content

Service Requests and Change Enablement

I was having a discussion with a learner this morning about the difference between Service Requests and Standard Changes.

This learner's organization publishes a list of standard services that users can request via a self-help tool. The Service Request is routed to the Service Desk. The Service Desk reviews the request. If appropriate, the Service Request may be fulfilled by applying a Standard Change that has been pre-authorized by the Change Enablement practice.

By definition, a Standard Change is a low-risk, pre-authorized change that is well understood and fully documented, and which can be implemented without needing additional authorization. Standard Changes must be recorded, possibly as a Service Request. However, each individual change does not require operational oversight by a change authority. ‘Pre-authorized’ means that the procedure for making the standard change has undergone a full risk assessment and authorization. These risk assessment and authorization steps would only need to be repeated if there is a modification to the way the change is carried out.

It is important to note that not all Service Requests are Standard Changes. Service Requests are an important type of user query and can include requests for a service action or information, requests for access to a resource, service, or service offering, and even feedback, such as complaints and compliments. Similarly, not all Standard Changes are Service Requests. Standard Changes can be operational in nature and can include routine housekeeping tasks and updates, installations, moves or changes being performed as part of an internal project, and other low-risk changes that are not "requestable" by users. Any Service Request or Standard Change that presents a higher risk may require reassessment or may be classified as a Normal Change or Emergency Change by the Change Enablement practice.

An efficient Service Request Management practice requires good process integration with the Change Enablement practice. It is also important to provide the Service Desk staff with the training and empowerment to fulfill either Service Requests or apply Standard Changes when appropriate. Requiring both mechanisms to perform one action is bureaucratic. Finally, users must be made aware of available service requests (typically via a Request Catalog) and fulfillment procedures.

In ITIL 4, the relationship between Service Requests and Standard Changes is explored in the following classes:

ITIL 4 Foundation: Provides an overview of key concepts, including the definition and management of Service Requests and Standard Changes within the Service Value System.

ITIL 4 Specialist: Create, Deliver, and Support: Explores in detail the practices related to service management, including handling and processing Service Requests and Standard Changes, and how they support service delivery and support.

ITIL 4 Specialist: Drive Stakeholder Value: Covers the management of stakeholder interactions and the role of Service Requests and Standard Changes in meeting stakeholder needs and expectations.

ITIL 4 Specialist: Monitor, Support and Fulfil: Covers the key concepts of five ITIL Practices: Incident Management, Service Desk, Service Request Management, Monitoring and Event Management, and Problem Management.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Four Service Characteristics

Recently I came across several articles by researchers and experts that laid out definitions and characteristics of services. ITIL provides us with a definition that can help drive the creation of value-laden services: A means of delivering value to customers by facilitating outcomes customers want to achieve without the ownership of specific costs and risks. An area that ITIL is not so clear is in terms of service characteristics. Several researchers and experts put forth that services have four basic characteristics (IHIP): Intangibility—Services are the results of actions not things. They have no physical presence and represent a logical set of elements. One way to think of service is “work done for others.”  Heterogeneity—Also known as “variability”; services are unique items because of the mechanisms used to deliver services, which is people. Because the people element adds variability, the service is variable. This holds true, especially for the value proposition—not eve...

What is the difference between Process Owner, Process Manager and Process Practitioner?

This article was originally published in 2015. With the Introduction of ITIL 4, some of this best practice has changed. See  ITIL 4 and the Evolving Role of Roles . Updated Definitions in ITIL 4: Process Owner: In ITIL 4, the concept of 'processes' has expanded into broader 'practices.' Consequently, the Process Owner is now often referred to as the 'Practice Owner.' This individual is accountable for the overall design, performance, integration, and improvement of a specific practice within the organization. They ensure that the practice achieves its intended outcomes and aligns with the organization's objectives. Process Manager: Now commonly known as the 'Practice Manager' in ITIL 4, this role is responsible for the day-to-day management of the practice. The Practice Manager ensures that activities are carried out as intended, manages resources assigned to the practice, and oversees the practitioners performing the work. Process Practit...

What Is A Service Offering?

The ITIL 4 Best Practice Guidance defines a “Service Offering” as a description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target customer or group.   As a service provider, we can’t stop there!   We must know what the contracts of our service offering are and be able to put them into context as required by the customer.     Let’s explore the three elements that comprise a Service Offering. A “Service Offering” may include:     Goods, Access to Resources, and Service Actions 1. Goods – When we think of “Goods” within a service offering these are the items where ownership is transferred to the consumer and the consumer takes responsibility for the future use of these goods.   Example of goods that are being provided in the offering – If this is a hotel service then toiletries or chocolates are yours to take with you.   You the consumer own these and they are yours to take with you.      ...